[Pharo-project] pharo.st should be a permanent domain, I think
Hi, I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful (and it has a .st!) One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is easily doable with an apache configuration. I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough, Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :) Cheers, Esteban
Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion... On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi, I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful (and it has a .st!) One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is easily doable with an apache configuration. I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough, Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :)
Cheers, Esteban
-1 ...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could discuss whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite long time ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that is the better name, in particular for people who don't know what the meaning of .st is. I think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in a search engine than on www.pharo-project.org. Cheers, Adrian On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote:
Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion...
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi, I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful (and it has a .st!) One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is easily doable with an apache configuration. I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough, Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :)
Cheers, Esteban
Hi Esteban,
...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The additional names should just redirect to this one.
why?
For instance to make sure that there are not the same pages listed in search engine results with different domain names. Then, (according to SEO guys) you get better indexed if you have just one domain name, redirecting to it and making all external links point to that name. In general, I like consistency and I don't like redundancy :). Imagine in the mailing list one guy linking to pharo.st/news the next to www.pharo-project.org/news the next to www.pharo.st/news etc... Cheers, Adrian
I agree with Adrian Alexandre Le 31 janv. 2011 à 15:31, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> a écrit :
-1
...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could discuss whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite long time ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that is the better name, in particular for people who don't know what the meaning of .st is. I think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in a search engine than on www.pharo-project.org.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote:
Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion...
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi, I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful (and it has a .st!) One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is easily doable with an apache configuration. I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough, Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :)
Cheers, Esteban
+1 Doru On 31 Jan 2011, at 22:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I agree with Adrian
Alexandre
Le 31 janv. 2011 à 15:31, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> a écrit :
-1
...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could discuss whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite long time ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that is the better name, in particular for people who don't know what the meaning of .st is. I think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in a search engine than on www.pharo-project.org.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote:
Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion...
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi, I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful (and it has a .st!) One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is easily doable with an apache configuration. I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough, Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :)
Cheers, Esteban
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."
ok, ok... I'm a minority :P I retire my proposition. best, Esteban El 31/01/2011, a las 6:36p.m., Tudor Girba escribió:
+1
Doru
On 31 Jan 2011, at 22:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I agree with Adrian
Alexandre
Le 31 janv. 2011 à 15:31, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> a écrit :
-1
...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could discuss whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite long time ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that is the better name, in particular for people who don't know what the meaning of .st is. I think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in a search engine than on www.pharo-project.org.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote:
Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion...
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi, I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful (and it has a .st!) One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is easily doable with an apache configuration. I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough, Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :)
Cheers, Esteban
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."
On 31 January 2011 22:42, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
ok, ok... I'm a minority :P I retire my proposition.
:) To change a name there should be a serious reasons. I felt in love with Squeak because i like the project and people and overall spirit, not because of its name (i admit i never liked it). Names could serve you a bad service if you change them often for no strong reason.
best, Esteban
El 31/01/2011, a las 6:36p.m., Tudor Girba escribió:
+1
Doru
On 31 Jan 2011, at 22:24, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I agree with Adrian
Alexandre
Le 31 janv. 2011 à 15:31, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> a écrit :
-1
...because in my opinion there should be exactly one main domain name. The additional names should just redirect to this one. Of course we could discuss whether pharo.st should be that main domain. But (already quite long time ago) we decided to go for pharo-project.org. I still think that is the better name, in particular for people who don't know what the meaning of .st is. I think they are less likely to klick on www.pharo.st in a search engine than on www.pharo-project.org.
Cheers, Adrian
On Jan 31, 2011, at 21:15 , Diogenes Moreira wrote:
Always ready. as a boy scout.. only send me de ssh conxion...
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>wrote:
Hi, I tried pharo.st to reach pharo. I liked. It's small, concise, beautiful (and it has a .st!) One problem is that as soon as you type pharo.st, you loose the url. I would like to stay in the url I entered to pharo-project. I think this is easily doable with an apache configuration. I'm not an apache guy, but I'm sure if there are some problem with this, and all of you agree this is desirable, someone from the list (cough, cough, Diógenes, cough, cough) can do the job :)
Cheers, Esteban
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
participants (6)
-
Adrian Lienhard -
Alexandre Bergel -
Diogenes Moreira -
Esteban Lorenzano -
Igor Stasenko -
Tudor Girba