[Pharo-project] Fwd: [Etoys] [RELEASE] Etoys 4.0
Begin forwarded message:
Resent-From: Bert Freudenberg <bert@freudenbergs.de> From: Bert Freudenberg <bert@freudenbergs.de> Date: December 17, 2008 12:28:26 AM CEST Resent-To: Sugar Devel <sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org> To: Sugar Devel <sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org> Resent-Cc: OLPC Etoys <etoys@lists.laptop.org>, OLPC Development <devel@lists.laptop.org
Subject: [Etoys] [RELEASE] Etoys 4.0
(resent with new download URLs and a bit more prose)
Hi folks,
this is the first release of Etoys 4.0. The major version jump signifies the end of our two-year relicensing effort.
Originally released in 1996, Apple relicensed the Squeak core under the Apache 2.0 license in October 2006 - thanks to Steve, Alan, and the lawyers involved. Then, Viewpoints Research collected written relicensing agreements from several hundred later contributors under the MIT license - thanks to Kim, and the Squeak community volunteers. Finally, all the code in Etoys not explicitly covered by a relicensing agreement was removed, or rewritten, or reverted to an earlier version - kudos to Yoshiki for the bulk of that work.
Looking forward to see Etoys properly packaged in more distros now :)
We may have broken stuff while removing and rewriting, so please report any oddities you notice.
Note: Etoys comes in two parts, one is the base (in Sugar Glucose, but will actually run on all platforms given a recent Squeak virtual machine) and one the activity bundle (in Fructose). Following the naming conventions the lower-case "etoys" package is the base while the activity is capitalized as "Etoys".
== Sources ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/etoys/etoys-4.0.2201.t...
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Etoys/Etoys-97.tar.gz
== Packaged ==
http://etoys.laptop.org/rpms/etoys-4.0.2201-1.noarch.rpm
http://etoys.laptop.org/rpms/Etoys-97.xo
== News ==
* removed/reverted/rewrote all methods not covered by Apache/MIT license * various fixes (#8928, #8929, #8879, #9058, and others)
- Bert (for the Etoys team) -
_______________________________________________ Etoys mailing list Etoys@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/etoys
Hi all, did we agree whether to make sure Pharo 1.0 is license clean as well? Just can't remember... Michael
I do not remember the list that we wrote on the board at Bern. I'm sure we sent it to the list. Stef On Dec 19, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
Hi all,
did we agree whether to make sure Pharo 1.0 is license clean as well? Just can't remember...
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
The list for 1.0 is on the wiki: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones Adrian On Dec 19, 2008, at 17:28 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I do not remember the list that we wrote on the board at Bern. I'm sure we sent it to the list.
Stef
On Dec 19, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
Hi all,
did we agree whether to make sure Pharo 1.0 is license clean as well? Just can't remember...
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
do you know if Yoshiki has the list of method he changed to be clean? Stef On Dec 19, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
Hi all,
did we agree whether to make sure Pharo 1.0 is license clean as well? Just can't remember...
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Ok so this is clear, mike do you know if we could get our hands on the changes Yoshiki did I could not understand his authoer Checker tools if somebody could investigate that we could then have an effort to fix Pharo. Stef On Dec 19, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
The list for 1.0 is on the wiki: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Milestones
Adrian
On Dec 19, 2008, at 17:28 , Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
I do not remember the list that we wrote on the board at Bern. I'm sure we sent it to the list.
Stef
On Dec 19, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Michael Rueger wrote:
Hi all,
did we agree whether to make sure Pharo 1.0 is license clean as well? Just can't remember...
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (3)
-
Adrian Lienhard -
Michael Rueger -
Stéphane Ducasse