#load complains about no defined stable* should I load bleeding edge or development? BTW they sound like the same thing, whatâs the difference between those branches? *suggestion: even if itâs beta or alpha I would make a stable just to set a foundation that does not confuses the users
Loads fine in a fresh 3.0 image for me. How did you load it? You should give some version numbers along with the problem! Norbert Am 04.04.2014 um 21:30 schrieb Sebastian Sastre <sebastian@flowingconcept.com>:
#load complains about no defined stable*
should I load bleeding edge or development?
BTW they sound like the same thing, whatâs the difference between those branches?
*suggestion: even if itâs beta or alpha I would make a stable just to set a foundation that does not confuses the users
sorry yeah itâs a fresh image, latest version: 30814 I can only load it using bleedingEdge On Apr 4, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
Loads fine in a fresh 3.0 image for me. How did you load it? You should give some version numbers along with the problem!
Norbert
Am 04.04.2014 um 21:30 schrieb Sebastian Sastre <sebastian@flowingconcept.com>:
#load complains about no defined stable*
should I load bleeding edge or development?
BTW they sound like the same thing, whatâs the difference between those branches?
*suggestion: even if itâs beta or alpha I would make a stable just to set a foundation that does not confuses the users
On Apr 4, 2014, at 8:21 PM, Ben Coman <btc@openInWorld.com> wrote:
I strongly disagree with defining #stable when its not. This completely breaks trust in #stable. Alternatively, it might be good that when #load complains about missing #stable, it suggests the other tags that are defined. cheers -ben
I get your point. Then what would make sense is to fallback to a #beta or #alpha release right? Right now weâre falling back to an exception that would be understood only by the ConfigurationOf priesthood. We need as much gentle starts of high return and good practices as possible guysâ¦
bleeding edge or development?
BTW they sound like the same thing, whatâs the difference between those branches?
Strange! I downloaded a fresh image and could load it just. Can you tell what the error is saying? It is hard to help without information. Norbert
Am 04.04.2014 um 23:28 schrieb Sebastian Sastre <sebastian@flowingconcept.com>:
sorry yeah itâs a fresh image, latest version: 30814
I can only load it using bleedingEdge
On Apr 4, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
Loads fine in a fresh 3.0 image for me. How did you load it? You should give some version numbers along with the problem!
Norbert
Am 04.04.2014 um 21:30 schrieb Sebastian Sastre <sebastian@flowingconcept.com>:
#load complains about no defined stable*
should I load bleeding edge or development?
BTW they sound like the same thing, whatâs the difference between those branches?
*suggestion: even if itâs beta or alpha I would make a stable just to set a foundation that does not confuses the users
participants (3)
-
Ben Coman -
Norbert Hartl -
Sebastian Sastre