Hi, We need a bit of help with testing the order in Spotter. We do not have a real solution yet, but the current one should improve the situation. We need a bit of feedback for this one: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17656/Spotter-should-sort-search-results Essentially, you would need to load the latest GT-Spotter and GT-SpotterExtensions-Core and let us know if it works better for spotting implementors or classes. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Obvious things are difficult to teach."
Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> writes:
Hi,
We need a bit of help with testing the order in Spotter. We do not have a real solution yet, but the current one should improve the situation.
We need a bit of feedback for this one: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17656/Spotter-should-sort-search-results
Essentially, you would need to load the latest GT-Spotter and GT-SpotterExtensions-Core and let us know if it works better for spotting implementors or classes.
I have the impression this is already in the image. It seems to be working fine. Next time, it might help if you could just give us a Pharo expression that loads the patch. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
On 24 Feb 2016, at 11:24, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@inria.fr> wrote:
Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> writes:
Hi,
We need a bit of help with testing the order in Spotter. We do not have a real solution yet, but the current one should improve the situation.
We need a bit of feedback for this one: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17656/Spotter-should-sort-search-results
Essentially, you would need to load the latest GT-Spotter and GT-SpotterExtensions-Core and let us know if it works better for spotting implementors or classes.
I have the impression this is already in the image. It seems to be working fine.
Yes, it works very well !
Next time, it might help if you could just give us a Pharo expression that loads the patch.
-- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
Hi,
On Feb 24, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@inria.fr> wrote:
Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> writes:
Hi,
We need a bit of help with testing the order in Spotter. We do not have a real solution yet, but the current one should improve the situation.
We need a bit of feedback for this one: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17656/Spotter-should-sort-search-results
Essentially, you would need to load the latest GT-Spotter and GT-SpotterExtensions-Core and let us know if it works better for spotting implementors or classes.
I have the impression this is already in the image. It seems to be working fine. Next time, it might help if you could just give us a Pharo expression that loads the patch.
Indeed, it is now in the image. Unfortunately, there was no feedback :(. I will do it better next time. I just thought that given the urgency with which issues were reported, people would have been more eager to test, so I hurried up :). Cheers, Doru
-- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
Hi Doru, I don't see a better way to have beta-testers than having your code on the pharo alpha image ;) You will have very soon feedback and then you can iterate. Cheers, Christophe
Hi, Thanks. Indeed, I agree with you. In fact, this is what we did, and then I was told that people would rather want to discuss beforehand :). So, actually, this was a little experiment. The thing is that we do not want to disturb people, but we need the feedback to improve fast. So, right now it looks like the only real way to get feedback is to push the changes. This has the tendency to create some annoyance, but we are trying to react as fast as we can to limit it. I hope this will be Ok with everyone. Cheers, Doru
On Feb 24, 2016, at 7:29 PM, Christophe Demarey <christophe.demarey@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi Doru,
I don't see a better way to have beta-testers than having your code on the pharo alpha image ;) You will have very soon feedback and then you can iterate.
Cheers, Christophe
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
right now feels a lot better than before. also the explicit (visible) keybingins to filter are a great addition :) Esteban
On 24 Feb 2016, at 19:34, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks. Indeed, I agree with you. In fact, this is what we did, and then I was told that people would rather want to discuss beforehand :). So, actually, this was a little experiment.
The thing is that we do not want to disturb people, but we need the feedback to improve fast. So, right now it looks like the only real way to get feedback is to push the changes. This has the tendency to create some annoyance, but we are trying to react as fast as we can to limit it. I hope this will be Ok with everyone.
Cheers, Doru
On Feb 24, 2016, at 7:29 PM, Christophe Demarey <christophe.demarey@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi Doru,
I don't see a better way to have beta-testers than having your code on the pharo alpha image ;) You will have very soon feedback and then you can iterate.
Cheers, Christophe
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
participants (5)
-
Christophe Demarey -
Damien Cassou -
Esteban Lorenzano -
Sven Van Caekenberghe -
Tudor Girba