[Pharo-project] Tracing special messages [WAS] Re: [Vm-dev] Re: normalSend, specialObjectsArray and VM
Hi. So....if I want to intercept ALL message sends....going to #normalSend is not enough since I have #class, #==, Float>>#+ etc that are executed directly like bytecodes. So...my questions are now: 1) Those special selectors are those that are in "Smalltalk specialSelectors" ? are there more? all from there are special? 2) All those "Smalltalk specialSelectors" have their associated bytecode primitive in Interpreter?? If true, then I should modify all bytecodePrim* in Interpreter. I am right? If I do that, that's all ? I am intercepting everything? Thanks a lot in advance, Mariano On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Craig Latta <craig@netjam.org> wrote:
Craig Latta has done all this work, talk to him.
Sure, I'd be happy to discuss it.
-C
-- Craig Latta www.netjam.org + 31 020 894 6247 + 1 415 287 3547
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi. So....if I want to intercept ALL message sends....going to #normalSend is not enough since I have #class, #==, Float>>#+ etc that are executed directly like bytecodes. So...my questions are now:
1) Those special selectors are those that are in "Smalltalk specialSelectors" ? are there more? all from there are special?
2) All those "Smalltalk specialSelectors" have their associated bytecode primitive in Interpreter?? If true, then I should modify all bytecodePrim* in Interpreter. I am right? If I do that, that's all ? I am intercepting everything?
Sorry I need not to count those bytecodePrim* that do a "normalSend" at the end. Isn't it?
Thanks a lot in advance,
Mariano
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Craig Latta <craig@netjam.org> wrote:
Craig Latta has done all this work, talk to him.
Sure, I'd be happy to discuss it.
-C
-- Craig Latta www.netjam.org + 31 020 894 6247 + 1 415 287 3547
participants (1)
-
Mariano Martinez Peck