[Pharo-project] [update 3.0] #30086
30086 ----- 10425 DateAndTime refactoring https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10425 Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/KernelTests-MarcusDenker.504 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Kernel-MarcusDenker.1410 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Fuel-MarcusDenker.764
Marcus Denker-4 wrote
30086 ... 10425 DateAndTime refactoring
Hooray, I love progress on DateAndTime... this one was reeeeally ugly! ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/update-3-0-30086-tp4685125p4685374.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
How about a 2.0 backport? On 3 May 2013 09:43, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
30086 -----
10425 DateAndTime refactoring https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10425
Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/KernelTests-MarcusDenker.504 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Kernel-MarcusDenker.1410 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Fuel-MarcusDenker.764
-- Milan Mimica http://sparklet.sf.net
On May 3, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Milan Mimica <milan.mimica@gmail.com> wrote:
How about a 2.0 backport?
Good questionâ¦
On 3 May 2013 09:43, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote: 30086 -----
10425 DateAndTime refactoring https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10425
Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/KernelTests-MarcusDenker.504 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Kernel-MarcusDenker.1410 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Fuel-MarcusDenker.764
-- Milan Mimica http://sparklet.sf.net
On 04 May 2013, at 08:37, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On May 3, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Milan Mimica <milan.mimica@gmail.com> wrote:
How about a 2.0 backport?
Good questionâ¦
That will be quite difficult: it is a pretty aggressive refactoring, based on some important modifications that came before it, and it will need further debugging - typical for the current dev branch, hard to do cleanly in a stable branch.
On 3 May 2013 09:43, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote: 30086 -----
10425 DateAndTime refactoring https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10425
Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/KernelTests-MarcusDenker.504 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Kernel-MarcusDenker.1410 http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Pharo/Pharo30/diff/Fuel-MarcusDenker.764
-- Milan Mimica http://sparklet.sf.net
mmimica wrote
How about a 2.0 backport?
As much as you all know I love backporting, in this case it's probably not a good place to apply resources. The changes are deep and it's been broken for years. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/update-3-0-30086-tp4685125p4685701.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (4)
-
Marcus Denker -
Milan Mimica -
Sean P. DeNigris -
Sven Van Caekenberghe