[Pharo-project] add return its argument
if somebody wants to check that the fixes I made are ok and that at:put: and add: return their arguments Stef
That looks good to me. If no additional tests break after loading it, I guess it should be clear to integrate. It is important to have a uniform protocol. We should do the same for #nextPut: and #nextPutAll: Lukas 2010/5/8 stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@free.fr>:
if somebody wants to check that the fixes I made are ok and that at:put: and add: return their arguments
Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
Tx! Soon in the update. On May 8, 2010, at 5:49 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
That looks good to me. If no additional tests break after loading it, I guess it should be clear to integrate. It is important to have a uniform protocol. We should do the same for #nextPut: and #nextPutAll:
Lukas
2010/5/8 stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@free.fr>:
if somebody wants to check that the fixes I made are ok and that at:put: and add: return their arguments
Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
I don't have time to scan the mailing list in detail. Was there any discussion that led to this change? Any pointers appreciated. I always thought the comfort of being able to chain selectors like add: outweighs the uniformity. Norbert On 08.05.2010, at 17:31, stephane ducasse wrote:
if somebody wants to check that the fixes I made are ok and that at:put: and add: return their arguments
<addReturnValue.1.cs>
Stef_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
consistency and this is linked to the work of nicolas to do the same in Squeak. Stef On May 10, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Norbert Hartl wrote:
I don't have time to scan the mailing list in detail. Was there any discussion that led to this change? Any pointers appreciated. I always thought the comfort of being able to chain selectors like add: outweighs the uniformity.
Norbert
On 08.05.2010, at 17:31, stephane ducasse wrote:
if somebody wants to check that the fixes I made are ok and that at:put: and add: return their arguments
<addReturnValue.1.cs>
Stef_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (4)
-
Lukas Renggli -
Norbert Hartl -
stephane ducasse -
Stéphane Ducasse