On 10 Feb 2014, at 11:08, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:

...

Phil,

This matter is actually very important for Smalltalk community, because it exposes nontransparent, meddling behind the scenes, and in some cases blatantly unethical behavior of some ESUG board members. Which is certainly bad for our community on long term.

Janko CAN YOU STOP!

"blatantly unethical behavior” Really

I propose we do at the next ESUG the following: - the general assembly sets up and vote for a small group (3-5 people?) - they look into the issues - then report back to the general assembly It will of course been taken care that this gremium is independed. Because via email this is really not going to work. Marcus