Hi guys with Olivier Auverlot we did several attempts (over the year) and we are happy to release a first draft of a web tutorial around Pharo. We ask the user to build a simple blog engine. It goes over - Mongo - Seaside - Magritte https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/TinyBlogTutorial/5/artifact/book-... Soon Rest/Deployment/Garage?/NeoJSON/XML If you want to participate (translate it to english) or improve it you are welcome. We hope that it will serve as a basis to a lot of Seaside applications. This tutorial will be used in the lecture I'm giving next weeks in Togo and will be edited as a lulu book. Stef and Olivier.
Looks good but I don't understand it :) Norbert
Am 13.12.2015 um 22:13 schrieb stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:
Hi guys
with Olivier Auverlot we did several attempts (over the year) and we are happy to release a first draft of a web tutorial around Pharo. We ask the user to build a simple blog engine.
It goes over - Mongo - Seaside - Magritte
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/TinyBlogTutorial/5/artifact/book-...
Soon Rest/Deployment/Garage?/NeoJSON/XML
If you want to participate (translate it to english) or improve it you are welcome.
We hope that it will serve as a basis to a lot of Seaside applications.
This tutorial will be used in the lecture I'm giving next weeks in Togo and will be edited as a lulu book.
Stef and Olivier.
Instead of the really unsafe password: thing, perhaps use hashPassword: aString ^GRPlatform current secureHashFor: aString password: anObject passwordHash := self hashPassword: anObject verifyPassword: aString ^(self hashPassword: aString) = self passwordHash. passwordHash passwordHash ifNil: [ ^'' ]. ^ passwordHash
On 15 Dec 2015, at 10:19, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
Instead of the really unsafe password: thing, perhaps use
hashPassword: aString ^GRPlatform current secureHashFor: aString
password: anObject passwordHash := self hashPassword: anObject
verifyPassword: aString ^(self hashPassword: aString) = self passwordHash.
passwordHash passwordHash ifNil: [ ^'' ]. ^ passwordHash
That last method is not needed, since 'any string' = nil is false, right ?
On 15 Dec 2015, at 10:34, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
On 15-12-15 10:23, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
passwordHash passwordHash ifNil: [ ^'' ]. ^ passwordHash
That last method is not needed, since 'any string' = nil is false, right ?
Yep.
Nu we toch Nederlands mogen praten, het lijkt me best om voorbeeld code zo minimaal mogelijk te houden. De paswoord hashing is wel een goed idee. ;-)
On 15-12-15 10:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
Nu we toch Nederlands mogen praten, het lijkt me best om voorbeeld code zo minimaal mogelijk te houden. De paswoord hashing is wel een goed idee.
Mijn Frans is best aardig, maar dit (pagina 63) begrijp ik niet helemaal: "If you run the test, it will fail because the system returns instances of posts instead of 2. Why this is happening? We never told the system that posts are objects that should be saved in the database."
On 15 Dec 2015, at 12:04, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
On 15-12-15 10:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
Nu we toch Nederlands mogen praten, het lijkt me best om voorbeeld code zo minimaal mogelijk te houden. De paswoord hashing is wel een goed idee.
Mijn Frans is best aardig, maar dit (pagina 63) begrijp ik niet helemaal:
"If you run the test, it will fail because the system returns instances of posts instead of 2. Why this is happening? We never told the system that posts are objects that should be saved in the database."
Après 63 pages, l'Anglais revient pour un paragraphe ... haha
I was probably in automatic text writing mode :) We will try to translate the tutorial but first we should finish it. Stef Le 15/12/15 12:46, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
On 15 Dec 2015, at 12:04, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
On 15-12-15 10:39, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
Nu we toch Nederlands mogen praten, het lijkt me best om voorbeeld code zo minimaal mogelijk te houden. De paswoord hashing is wel een goed idee. Mijn Frans is best aardig, maar dit (pagina 63) begrijp ik niet helemaal:
"If you run the test, it will fail because the system returns instances of posts instead of 2. Why this is happening? We never told the system that posts are objects that should be saved in the database." Après 63 pages, l'Anglais revient pour un paragraphe ... haha
On Dec 15, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 15 Dec 2015, at 10:34, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
On 15-12-15 10:23, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
passwordHash passwordHash ifNil: [ ^'' ]. ^ passwordHash
That last method is not needed, since 'any string' = nil is false, right ?
Yep.
Nu we toch Nederlands mogen praten, het lijkt me best om voorbeeld code zo minimaal mogelijk te houden. De paswoord hashing is wel een goed idee.
Yay Nederlanders :D
En franstaligers die nederlands kunnen begrijpen. Schrijven is een andere verhaal :-) Phil On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Skip Lentz <skip.lentz@inria.fr> wrote:
On Dec 15, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 15 Dec 2015, at 10:34, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
On 15-12-15 10:23, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
passwordHash passwordHash ifNil: [ ^'' ]. ^ passwordHash
That last method is not needed, since 'any string' = nil is false, right ?
Yep.
Nu we toch Nederlands mogen praten, het lijkt me best om voorbeeld code zo minimaal mogelijk te houden. De paswoord hashing is wel een goed idee.
Yay Nederlanders :D
participants (6)
-
Norbert Hartl -
phil＠highoctane.be -
Skip Lentz -
Stephan Eggermont -
stepharo -
Sven Van Caekenberghe