what I know is that FileDirectory code is far from suboptimal Stef On Oct 4, 2009, at 3:51 AM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:

Please take alook at FileDirectory>>directoryContentsFor:. Does it have any business being on the instance side of FileDirectory? It looks like it _completely_ ignores the receiver and if anything should be a class method somewhere, or changed to work relative to a receiver, or something.

Bill

_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project