PI'm promoting new stable VMs
in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably: - compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things cheers, Esteban
Hi. Black screen on startup is still there on Mac Sierra 32 bits VM 2017-05-03 9:43 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:
in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
I know, but cannot wait for promoting⦠is âstable enoughâ. Also⦠problem is not present on other flavours so I guess is an image problem. Guille worked a bit on it but we need to review some more. Esteban
On 3 May 2017, at 10:03, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi.
Black screen on startup is still there on Mac Sierra 32 bits VM
2017-05-03 9:43 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>>: in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
Also good news that image drag and drop into latest VM works fine again 2017-05-03 10:10 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:
I know, but cannot wait for promoting⦠is âstable enoughâ. Also⦠problem is not present on other flavours so I guess is an image problem. Guille worked a bit on it but we need to review some more.
Esteban
On 3 May 2017, at 10:03, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi.
Black screen on startup is still there on Mac Sierra 32 bits VM
2017-05-03 9:43 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:
in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
Hi Esteban, $ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest | bash $ ./pharo --version Shows the build version as: VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $ Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)? Thanks, Alistair On 3 May 2017 at 09:43, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
On 3 May 2017, at 12:38, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Esteban,
$ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest | bash $ ./pharo --version
Shows the build version as:
VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $
Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)?
officials VM for Pharo now are built using opensmalltalk-vm, yes. we still keep our process for CI/testing purposes, though. Esteban
Thanks, Alistair
On 3 May 2017 at 09:43, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
On May 3, 2017, at 4:22 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3 May 2017, at 12:38, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Esteban,
$ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest | bash $ ./pharo --version
Shows the build version as:
VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $
Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)?
officials VM for Pharo now are built using opensmalltalk-vm, yes. we still keep our process for CI/testing purposes, though.
Woot! Thank you Esteban!!
Esteban
Thanks, Alistair
On 3 May 2017 at 09:43, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote: in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
2017-05-03 17:45 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com>:
On May 3, 2017, at 4:22 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3 May 2017, at 12:38, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Esteban,
$ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest | bash $ ./pharo --version
Shows the build version as:
VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $
Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)?
officials VM for Pharo now are built using opensmalltalk-vm, yes. we still keep our process for CI/testing purposes, though.
Woot! Thank you Esteban!!
+1 That will help us to help you, it's a win win.
Esteban
Thanks, Alistair
On 3 May 2017 at 09:43, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote: in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
I'm now chasing an old 64 bits vm from files.pharo.org. All the new ones for the past 2 months segfault. Would anybody have kept a ~ 2 month old 64 bits vm (threaded or not) for linux somewhere? Regards, Thierry Le 03/05/2017 à 21:58, Nicolas Cellier a écrit :
2017-05-03 17:45 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com <mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com>>:
> On May 3, 2017, at 4:22 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: > > >> On 3 May 2017, at 12:38, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com <mailto:akgrant0710@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi Esteban, >> >> $ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest <http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest> | bash >> $ ./pharo --version >> >> Shows the build version as: >> >> VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git <https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git> >> Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $ >> >> Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository >> instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)? > > officials VM for Pharo now are built using opensmalltalk-vm, yes. > we still keep our process for CI/testing purposes, though.
Woot! Thank you Esteban!!
+1 That will help us to help you, it's a win win.
> > Esteban > >> >> Thanks, >> Alistair >> >> >>> On 3 May 2017 at 09:43, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. >>> The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably: >>> >>> - compactor works >>> - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) >>> - lot of other small things >>> >>> cheers, >>> Esteban >>> >> > >
Hi Thierry,
On May 3, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm now chasing an old 64 bits vm from files.pharo.org. All the new ones for the past 2 months segfault. Would anybody have kept a ~ 2 month old 64 bits vm (threaded or not) for linux somewhere?
I think the issue is not the version of the VM sources but the version of GCC. Iconoile the 64-bit Linux VMs I build with GCC 4.4.x and see no problems. Bintray uses 4.6.x and apparently segfaults. Are you able to checkout opensmalltalk-vm and build your own 64-bit Linux vm using GCC 4.4.x? You may have more success via this route. HTH
Regards,
Thierry
Le 03/05/2017 à 21:58, Nicolas Cellier a écrit :
2017-05-03 17:45 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com <mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com>>:
On May 3, 2017, at 4:22 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 3 May 2017, at 12:38, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com <mailto:akgrant0710@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Esteban,
$ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest <http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest> | bash $ ./pharo --version
Shows the build version as:
VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git <https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git> Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $
Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)?
officials VM for Pharo now are built using opensmalltalk-vm, yes. we still keep our process for CI/testing purposes, though.
Woot! Thank you Esteban!!
+1 That will help us to help you, it's a win win.
Esteban
Thanks, Alistair
On 3 May 2017 at 09:43, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com
<mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
Le 03/05/2017 à 22:39, Eliot Miranda a écrit :
Hi Thierry,
Hi Eliot,
On May 3, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm now chasing an old 64 bits vm from files.pharo.org. All the new ones for the past 2 months segfault. Would anybody have kept a ~ 2 month old 64 bits vm (threaded or not) for linux somewhere?
I think the issue is not the version of the VM sources but the version of GCC. Iconoile the 64-bit Linux VMs I build with GCC 4.4.x and see no problems. Bintray uses 4.6.x and apparently segfaults. Are you able to checkout opensmalltalk-vm and build your own 64-bit Linux vm using GCC 4.4.x? You may have more success via this route.
I'm on a system with gcc 6.3.0. The previous stable pharo vm is fine (20170212) so I'm back on it. None of the newest are, but I haven't done a bisect to tell you which number triggers the segfault. I do have random lockups with OSProcess on it, but they are cured with a Ctrl+., which is nice. I've never managed to get a home-compiled 64 bits vm to work without a segfault or a deadlock, so I've given up that path (*). Regards, Thierry (*) I've never managed to be sure I had all the dependencies right (i.e. tracking through the long log output and trying to make sure cover all the errors by loading the right package). I could compile the vm, and run it a bit (run a few image building commands) before hitting either a deadlock (OSProcess-related?) or a segfault.
HTH
Regards,
Thierry
Le 03/05/2017 à 21:58, Nicolas Cellier a écrit :
2017-05-03 17:45 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com <mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com>>:
On May 3, 2017, at 4:22 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 3 May 2017, at 12:38, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com <mailto:akgrant0710@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Esteban,
$ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest <http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest> | bash $ ./pharo --version
Shows the build version as:
VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git <https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git> Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $
Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)?
officials VM for Pharo now are built using opensmalltalk-vm, yes. we still keep our process for CI/testing purposes, though.
Woot! Thank you Esteban!!
+1 That will help us to help you, it's a win win.
Esteban
Thanks, Alistair
On 3 May 2017 at 09:43, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com
<mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
On May 3, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 03/05/2017 à 22:39, Eliot Miranda a écrit : Hi Thierry,
Hi Eliot,
On May 3, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm now chasing an old 64 bits vm from files.pharo.org. All the new ones for the past 2 months segfault. Would anybody have kept a ~ 2 month old 64 bits vm (threaded or not) for linux somewhere?
I think the issue is not the version of the VM sources but the version of GCC. Iconoile the 64-bit Linux VMs I build with GCC 4.4.x and see no problems. Bintray uses 4.6.x and apparently segfaults. Are you able to checkout opensmalltalk-vm and build your own 64-bit Linux vm using GCC 4.4.x? You may have more success via this route.
I'm on a system with gcc 6.3.0. The previous stable pharo vm is fine (20170212) so I'm back on it. None of the newest are, but I haven't done a bisect to tell you which number triggers the segfault.
I do have random lockups with OSProcess on it, but they are cured with a Ctrl+., which is nice.
I've never managed to get a home-compiled 64 bits vm to work without a segfault or a deadlock, so I've given up that path (*).
Then I'll try and have a look asap.
Regards,
Thierry
(*) I've never managed to be sure I had all the dependencies right (i.e. tracking through the long log output and trying to make sure cover all the errors by loading the right package). I could compile the vm, and run it a bit (run a few image building commands) before hitting either a deadlock (OSProcess-related?) or a segfault.
HTH
Regards,
Thierry
Le 03/05/2017 à 21:58, Nicolas Cellier a écrit :
2017-05-03 17:45 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com <mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com>>:
On May 3, 2017, at 4:22 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 3 May 2017, at 12:38, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com <mailto:akgrant0710@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Esteban,
$ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest <http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest> | bash $ ./pharo --version
Shows the build version as:
VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git <https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git> Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $
Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)?
officials VM for Pharo now are built using opensmalltalk-vm, yes. we still keep our process for CI/testing purposes, though.
Woot! Thank you Esteban!!
+1 That will help us to help you, it's a win win.
Esteban
Thanks, Alistair
On 3 May 2017 at 09:43, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com
<mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
Le 03/05/2017 à 23:50, Eliot Miranda a écrit :
On May 3, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 03/05/2017 à 22:39, Eliot Miranda a écrit : Hi Thierry,
Hi Eliot,
On May 3, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm now chasing an old 64 bits vm from files.pharo.org. All the new ones for the past 2 months segfault. Would anybody have kept a ~ 2 month old 64 bits vm (threaded or not) for linux somewhere?
I think the issue is not the version of the VM sources but the version of GCC. Iconoile the 64-bit Linux VMs I build with GCC 4.4.x and see no problems. Bintray uses 4.6.x and apparently segfaults. Are you able to checkout opensmalltalk-vm and build your own 64-bit Linux vm using GCC 4.4.x? You may have more success via this route.
I'm on a system with gcc 6.3.0. The previous stable pharo vm is fine (20170212) so I'm back on it. None of the newest are, but I haven't done a bisect to tell you which number triggers the segfault.
I do have random lockups with OSProcess on it, but they are cured with a Ctrl+., which is nice.
I've never managed to get a home-compiled 64 bits vm to work without a segfault or a deadlock, so I've given up that path (*).
Then I'll try and have a look asap.
Thanks! Thierry
Regards,
Thierry
(*) I've never managed to be sure I had all the dependencies right (i.e. tracking through the long log output and trying to make sure cover all the errors by loading the right package). I could compile the vm, and run it a bit (run a few image building commands) before hitting either a deadlock (OSProcess-related?) or a segfault.
HTH
Regards,
Thierry
Le 03/05/2017 à 21:58, Nicolas Cellier a écrit :
2017-05-03 17:45 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com <mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com>>:
On May 3, 2017, at 4:22 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 3 May 2017, at 12:38, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com <mailto:akgrant0710@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Esteban,
$ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest <http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest> | bash $ ./pharo --version
Shows the build version as:
VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git <https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git> Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $
Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)?
officials VM for Pharo now are built using opensmalltalk-vm, yes. we still keep our process for CI/testing purposes, though.
Woot! Thank you Esteban!!
+1 That will help us to help you, it's a win win.
Esteban
Thanks, Alistair
On 3 May 2017 at 09:43, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com
<mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
On 3 May 2017, at 22:20, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm now chasing an old 64 bits vm from files.pharo.org. All the new ones for the past 2 months segfault. Would anybody have kept a ~ 2 month old 64 bits vm (threaded or not) for linux somewhere?
here you can download older 64bits VM: http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo-spur64/linux/ <http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo-spur64/linux/> (oldest is from 10/01) now⦠I do not segfault directly. I just downloaded: wget -O- get.pharo.org/64/60+vmT <http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmT> | bash image starts fine for me (xubuntu 64bits 16.04) ⦠and then run all tests, that produces a fairly amount of errors/failures and *eventually* crashes the VM (crash attached). vm version: CoInterpreter VMMaker.oscog-eem.2203 uuid: 12d4afae-8498-4e76-8efe-60eba6ef4db2 May 2 2017 StackToRegisterMappingCogit VMMaker.oscog-eem.2203 uuid: 12d4afae-8498-4e76-8efe-60eba6ef4db2 May 2 2017 VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git $ Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $ Plugins: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git $
Regards,
Thierry
Le 03/05/2017 à 21:58, Nicolas Cellier a écrit :
2017-05-03 17:45 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com <mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com>>:
On May 3, 2017, at 4:22 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 3 May 2017, at 12:38, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com <mailto:akgrant0710@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Esteban,
$ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest <http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest> | bash $ ./pharo --version
Shows the build version as:
VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git <https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git> Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $
Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)?
officials VM for Pharo now are built using opensmalltalk-vm, yes. we still keep our process for CI/testing purposes, though.
Woot! Thank you Esteban!!
+1 That will help us to help you, it's a win win.
Esteban
Thanks, Alistair
On 3 May 2017 at 09:43, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com
<mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
2017-05-04 7:58 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:
On 3 May 2017, at 22:20, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm now chasing an old 64 bits vm from files.pharo.org. All the new ones for the past 2 months segfault. Would anybody have kept a ~ 2 month old 64 bits vm (threaded or not) for linux somewhere?
here you can download older 64bits VM: http://files.pharo.org/vm/ pharo-spur64/linux/ (oldest is from 10/01) now⦠I do not segfault directly. I just downloaded:
wget -O- get.pharo.org/64/60+vmT | bash
image starts fine for me (xubuntu 64bits 16.04)
Reusing your script, I have. - First start up is ok. got threaded priorities warning even if I have the /etc/security/limits.d/pharo.conf set. - third image building command segfault while loading packages. Very reliable. Fails every time, as far as I can see, at the same point. I bisected over all versions of the itimer and the threaded vms, and I got the following: The last vm that doesn't segfault is 201704030814-0b76880 for the itimer vm, and 201704111618-0e1fc3a for the threaded one. Regards, Thierry
⦠and then run all tests, that produces a fairly amount of errors/failures and *eventually* crashes the VM (crash attached).
vm version: CoInterpreter VMMaker.oscog-eem.2203 uuid: 12d4afae-8498-4e76-8efe-60eba6ef4db2 May 2 2017 StackToRegisterMappingCogit VMMaker.oscog-eem.2203 uuid: 12d4afae-8498-4e76-8efe-60eba6ef4db2 May 2 2017 VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git $ Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $ Plugins: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git $
Regards,
Thierry
Le 03/05/2017 à 21:58, Nicolas Cellier a écrit :
2017-05-03 17:45 GMT+02:00 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com <mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com <eliot.miranda@gmail.com>>>:
On May 3, 2017, at 4:22 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com < mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com <estebanlm@gmail.com>>> wrote:
On 3 May 2017, at 12:38, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com < mailto:akgrant0710@gmail.com <akgrant0710@gmail.com>>> wrote:
Hi Esteban,
$ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest <http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest> | bash $ ./pharo --version
Shows the build version as:
VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk- vm.git <https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git> Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $
Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)?
officials VM for Pharo now are built using opensmalltalk-vm, yes. we still keep our process for CI/testing purposes, though.
Woot! Thank you Esteban!!
+1 That will help us to help you, it's a win win.
Esteban
Thanks, Alistair
On 3 May 2017 at 09:43, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com
<mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com <estebanlm@gmail.com>>> wrote:
in 15min, I will promote latest VM to stable VM. The new stable VM has a lot of bugfixes, notably:
- compactor works - Cairo and Surface plugin now can coexist (and it does not crashes) - lot of other small things
cheers, Esteban
Hi Esteban, On 3 May 2017 at 13:22, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3 May 2017, at 12:38, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Esteban,
$ curl http://get.pharo.org/64/60+vmLatest | bash $ ./pharo --version
Shows the build version as:
VM: 201705022326 https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm.git Date: Tue May 2 16:26:41 2017 -0700 $
Does that mean we should be building from the opensmalltalk repository instead of the pharo-vm repository (even temporarily)?
officials VM for Pharo now are built using opensmalltalk-vm, yes. we still keep our process for CI/testing purposes, though.
Great, thanks for the clarification. Cheers, Alistair
participants (6)
-
Alistair Grant -
Denis Kudriashov -
Eliot Miranda -
Esteban Lorenzano -
Nicolas Cellier -
Thierry Goubier