Done: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17179/Semantic-analysis-doesn-t-compute-RB... On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:

yes !

...

On 03 Dec 2015, at 14:16, Martin Dias <tinchodias@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

In Pharo 4, the RBExplicitVariableParser computed the argument variables as RBArgumentNodes:

(Integer >> #bitAnd:) parseTree arguments "--> an OrderedCollection(RBArgumentNode(n))"

In Pharo 50191, such parser was removed (case 16026) because "semantic analysis" does the same job. However, it does not exactly the same job: argument variables are now parsed as generic variable nodes:

(Integer >> #bitAnd:) parseTree doSemanticAnalysis arguments "an OrderedCollection(RBVariableNode(n))"

Anyway, it works well with other variables, e.g. temporaries:

(Integer >> #bitAnd:) parseTree doSemanticAnalysis temporaries "an OrderedCollection(RBTemporaryNode(norm))"

Should I create a bug entry?

Cheers, Martin