[Pharo-project] Cleaning included Monticello repositories in PharoCore
Hi folks: I was thinking that at least for the 1.0 release we should remove obsolete default repositories. I don't know if the word is "default" but I mean to those repositories that are already added when you download PharoCore 1.0 image. Those repositories are: 1) http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo 2) http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox 3) www.squeaksource.com/Installer 4) www.squeaksource.com/UIEnhancements 5) http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/flair 1) and 2) are ok. 3) I think we should remove it. 4) and 5) are there becuase Gofer and Polymorph are included in the Core image? What do you think ? Cheers Mariano
Hi Mariano, I think that is a good idea. Just a note: Gofer is in: http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/gofer and not in: http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/flair Cheers, Doru On 14 Feb 2010, at 23:11, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi folks: I was thinking that at least for the 1.0 release we should remove obsolete default repositories. I don't know if the word is "default" but I mean to those repositories that are already added when you download PharoCore 1.0 image.
Those repositories are:
1) http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo 2) http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox 3) www.squeaksource.com/Installer 4) www.squeaksource.com/UIEnhancements 5) http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/flair
1) and 2) are ok. 3) I think we should remove it. 4) and 5) are there becuase Gofer and Polymorph are included in the Core image?
What do you think ?
Cheers
Mariano _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Some battles are better lost than fought."
If Gofer and Polymorph are included in the Core image ... wouldn't it make more sense for those to be moved to those Pharo repositories then? -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Cleaning-included-Monticello-repositories-in-PharoCore-... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
normally what we should do is to copy the versions of gofer that are used in the pharo repository /probably we should do the same for polymorph. like that we have one self contained version. On Feb 15, 2010, at 8:15 AM, Geert Claes wrote:
If Gofer and Polymorph are included in the Core image ... wouldn't it make more sense for those to be moved to those Pharo repositories then? -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Cleaning-included-Monticello-repositories-in-PharoCore-... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
1) http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo 2) http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox 3) www.squeaksource.com/Installer 4) www.squeaksource.com/UIEnhancements 5) http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/flair
I sugest to only keep 1 and 2. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
Ok...thanks for the answers. Then we should keep only 1 and 2. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1967 On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
1) http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo 2) http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox 3) www.squeaksource.com/Installer 4) www.squeaksource.com/UIEnhancements 5) http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/flair
I sugest to only keep 1 and 2.
Lukas
-- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
+1 Adrian BTW: packages such as Gofer and Polymorph are all copied/merged in the Pharo repository On Feb 15, 2010, at 09:59 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Ok...thanks for the answers. Then we should keep only 1 and 2.
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1967
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
1) http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo 2) http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox 3) www.squeaksource.com/Installer 4) www.squeaksource.com/UIEnhancements 5) http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/flair
I sugest to only keep 1 and 2.
Lukas
-- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
good initiative Stef On Feb 14, 2010, at 11:11 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Hi folks: I was thinking that at least for the 1.0 release we should remove obsolete default repositories. I don't know if the word is "default" but I mean to those repositories that are already added when you download PharoCore 1.0 image.
Those repositories are:
1) http://www.squeaksource.com/Pharo 2) http://www.squeaksource.com/PharoInbox 3) www.squeaksource.com/Installer 4) www.squeaksource.com/UIEnhancements 5) http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/flair
1) and 2) are ok. 3) I think we should remove it. 4) and 5) are there becuase Gofer and Polymorph are included in the Core image?
What do you think ?
Cheers
Mariano _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (6)
-
Adrian Lienhard -
Geert Claes -
Lukas Renggli -
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba