Re: [Pharo-project] shout and Pharo 1.2 or 1.3
On Feb 13, 2011, at 5:44 AM, Hilaire Fernandes wrote:
I have been reading the related discussion in the bug tracker. It is not clear to me if finally shout will eventually work with 1.2. I am going to prepare a DrGeo public release where I want shout, I am wondering if I should just use early 1.3 Pharo to do (where shout works nicely). Are there any reason or pitfall I should be aware of before doing so?
If there is something so important so people would use 1.3 instead of 1.2, then why do we not fix it? http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone=1.2-DevImage We should really try to get 1.2 ready. this is getting really boring, and I really have no energy left anymore for it. Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
Marcus you should learn how not to burn your energy. I think that this is important and I take pharo exactly has an exercise. I burned myself writing project proposals and budget so :) Kind of zen exercise because the problem with shout is not complex. Just that email communications are more difficult to communicate and to follow. Stef
I have been reading the related discussion in the bug tracker. It is not clear to me if finally shout will eventually work with 1.2. I am going to prepare a DrGeo public release where I want shout, I am wondering if I should just use early 1.3 Pharo to do (where shout works nicely). Are there any reason or pitfall I should be aware of before doing so?
If there is something so important so people would use 1.3 instead of 1.2, then why do we not fix it?
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=2&q=milestone=1.2-DevImage
We should really try to get 1.2 ready. this is getting really boring, and I really have no energy left anymore for it.
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
participants (2)
-
Marcus Denker -
Stéphane Ducasse