Re: [Pharo-project] we cannot add attachment anymore on the bug tracker
On Feb 25, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Isn't it because you went passed the quota? The bad thing about attachments in Google Code is that you have only 50MB for it.
You can find the current status in Administer/Advanced.
Maybe this is the hint to move to something else... what I really want (need) is a bugtracker that allows better sorting of bug reports. Tags are great. But tags do not replace sub-projects. I want a bug tracker just for Cog. And one just for "the nuts", or one for morphic... This way we could actually get structure in the 560 reports... Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine). Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-) Lukas On 25 February 2011 22:29, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Isn't it because you went passed the quota? The bad thing about attachments in Google Code is that you have only 50MB for it.
You can find the current status in Administer/Advanced.
Maybe this is the hint to move to something else... what I really want (need) is a bugtracker that allows better sorting of bug reports. Tags are great. But tags do not replace sub-projects. I want a bug tracker just for Cog. And one just for "the nuts", or one for morphic...
This way we could actually get structure in the 560 reports...
Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
    Marcus
-- Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
On 25 February 2011 23:53, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
i don't know such people personally. And as to me a community resources should not depend on good will of single person (or organization), because it makes the whole construction quite fragile. -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
On 26 February 2011 00:16, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 25 February 2011 23:53, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
i don't know such people personally.
Yes, I don't know you either. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
On 26 February 2011 00:17, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 February 2011 00:16, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 25 February 2011 23:53, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
i don't know such people personally.
Yes, I don't know you either.
that was rude. To clarify, i meant i don't know anyone who could help with that. But if you do, feel free to ask for help.
Lukas
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
I am probably expressing myself badly, but the quota of the Pharo project is already increased. There is also an issue tracker for the issue tracker: http://code.google.com/p/support/ Lukas On Saturday, 26 February 2011, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 February 2011 00:17, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 February 2011 00:16, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 25 February 2011 23:53, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
i don't know such people personally.
Yes, I don't know you either.
that was rude.
To clarify, i meant i don't know anyone who could help with that. But if you do, feel free to ask for help.
Lukas
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 12:40:33AM +0100, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 26 February 2011 00:17, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 February 2011 00:16, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 25 February 2011 23:53, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
i don't know such people personally.
Yes, I don't know you either.
that was rude.
I do not think it was meant to be rude. I am guessing that this was just a way to say thank you to Nathanael Schärli, an esteemed Squeak (Pharo) alumnus who IIRC is now working for Google. For myself, I don't know any of the Squeak/Pharo folks personally, so I don't think there is anything wrong with that :) Dave
tx lukas Do you know if there is a normal process to request such increase? Stef On Feb 25, 2011, at 11:53 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
Lukas
On 25 February 2011 22:29, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Isn't it because you went passed the quota? The bad thing about attachments in Google Code is that you have only 50MB for it.
You can find the current status in Administer/Advanced.
Maybe this is the hint to move to something else... what I really want (need) is a bugtracker that allows better sorting of bug reports. Tags are great. But tags do not replace sub-projects. I want a bug tracker just for Cog. And one just for "the nuts", or one for morphic...
This way we could actually get structure in the 560 reports...
Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
Yes. Lukas pointed us to the docs. You can find the answer here: http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/FAQ#What_other_limits_exist? Cheers, Doru On 26 Feb 2011, at 22:05, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
tx lukas Do you know if there is a normal process to request such increase?
Stef
On Feb 25, 2011, at 11:53 PM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
Thanks for letting me know. Getting the quota increased is pretty easy (kudos Nathaniel), if you ask the right people ;-)
Lukas
On 25 February 2011 22:29, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Feb 25, 2011, at 8:33 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Isn't it because you went passed the quota? The bad thing about attachments in Google Code is that you have only 50MB for it.
You can find the current status in Administer/Advanced.
Maybe this is the hint to move to something else... what I really want (need) is a bugtracker that allows better sorting of bug reports. Tags are great. But tags do not replace sub-projects. I want a bug tracker just for Cog. And one just for "the nuts", or one for morphic...
This way we could actually get structure in the 560 reports...
Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
On 26 February 2011 22:05, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
tx lukas Do you know if there is a normal process to request such increase?
Create an issue in the issue tracker of Google Code (see http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/list) and ask for a quota increase. Alternatively you might try to directly contact one of the projects members of Google Code (see http://code.google.com/p/support/). I contacted Nathaniel (this is not Nathanael Schärli), because I saw that he helped other projects with similar issues too. Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
Does anybody has experience with them? It would be good to be able to play with them. Stef
Redmine is the one I use and it is really good. El sáb, 26-02-2011 a las 18:55 +0100, Stéphane Ducasse escribió:
Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
Does anybody has experience with them? It would be good to be able to play with them.
Stef
-- Miguel Cobá http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
On 26.02.2011, at 18:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
Does anybody has experience with them? It would be good to be able to play with them.
I just want to ask if there are any plans to integrate issue support in the new squeaksource development. I don't know redmine but it looks similar to trac I'm using since a few years. I also know jira. To me one of the biggest gains of these systems is the integration of source, issues, timeline and wiki. You can easily reference a ticket from the wiki, a ticket from a commit message etc. In trac it is #<number> is interpreted as a link to a ticket. In jira it is <projectname>-<projectnumber>. In jira you can alter the issue tracker by committing new sources. If you write yourproject-58 into the commit than you can change the state of the ticket to something like "needs check" "treated" etc. It sounds a bit blurry but it helps a lot. Sad but true biblicello [1] wasn't in place at the right time. I think it has huge potential by leveraging pier usage. Norbert [1] http://a-bibliocello.gemstone.com/bibliocello/
El dom, 27-02-2011 a las 12:02 +0100, Norbert Hartl escribió:
On 26.02.2011, at 18:55, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Redmine (http://www.redmine.org/) supports sub-projects. Or maybe https://www.chiliproject.org/ (a fork of redmine).
Does anybody has experience with them? It would be good to be able to play with them.
I just want to ask if there are any plans to integrate issue support in the new squeaksource development. I don't know redmine but it looks similar to trac I'm using since a few years. I also know jira. To me one of the biggest gains of these systems is the integration of source, issues, timeline and wiki. You can easily reference a ticket from the wiki, a ticket from a commit message etc. In trac it is #<number> is interpreted as a link to a ticket. In jira it is <projectname>-<projectnumber>. In jira you can alter the issue tracker by committing new sources. If you write yourproject-58 into the commit than you can change the state of the ticket to something like "needs check" "treated" etc. It sounds a bit blurry but it helps a lot.
Yes, redmine has those capabilities too. And as you said, they are very helpful indeed to automate things.
Sad but true biblicello [1] wasn't in place at the right time. I think it has huge potential by leveraging pier usage.
Norbert
-- Miguel Cobá http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
participants (8)
-
David T. Lewis -
Igor Stasenko -
Lukas Renggli -
Marcus Denker -
Miguel Cobá -
Norbert Hartl -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba