[update 6.1] #60542
60542 ----- 22305 Backport to Pharo6: "Leave Variable Undeclared" https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22305 <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22305> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22305> 22298 Backport of the fix of Infinite Debugger https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22298 <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22298>
Hi Marcus - does this mean that a fresh zero conf of 6.1 will have the variable undeclared change? If so - then I should remove my port of your fix into what I load into exercism. This does raise an interesting question - is there a way to get a fixed 6.1 version (like a tag) - so that I donât always have to retest if stuff gets ported? (e.g. have a known tagged version that will work until I retest with later back ports?) Tim
On 17 Aug 2018, at 07:55, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
60542 -----
22305 Backport to Pharo6: "Leave Variable Undeclared" https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22305 <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22305> <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22305> 22298 Backport of the fix of Infinite Debugger https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22298 <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/22298>
On 17 Aug 2018, at 14:25, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:
Hi Marcus - does this mean that a fresh zero conf of 6.1 will have the variable undeclared change? If so - then I should remove my port of your fix into what I load into exercism.
Yes!
This does raise an interesting question - is there a way to get a fixed 6.1 version (like a tag) - so that I donât always have to retest if stuff gets ported? (e.g. have a known tagged version that will work until I retest with later back ports?)
There is the update number. This is 60542. You can treat that like a minor version number 542 of Pharo6. Marcus
participants (2)
-
Marcus Denker -
Tim Mackinnon