[Pharo-project] [update] 10472
Issue 1310: Make all tests green (not complete yet) - Remove class MethodHighlightingTests - ParseNode removeSelector: #addCommentToMorph: - Fix SelfEvaluatingObjectTest>>testArray ({1 + 0 . 1 @ 2 . 3}' prints '{1. 1@2. 3}) - Remove method CompiledMethod>>primitiveNode as it is not used anymore - Fix toolbuilder tests (sort of) - Fix Decompiler>>decompileBlock: (regression of closure fixes). This makes BlockContextTest>>testDecompile pass again - Make BlockContextTest>>testTrace run by commenting out broken part of code simulation Issue 1308: FixedIdentitySet = fails when compared with an integer ___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
Hi Adrian is method highlighting test broken or bogus? Was there a reason to not mark it expected failure? Thanks mike On Saturday, October 17, 2009, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Issue 1310: Â Â Make all tests green (not complete yet) - Remove class MethodHighlightingTests - ParseNode removeSelector: #addCommentToMorph: - Fix SelfEvaluatingObjectTest>>testArray ({1 + 0 . 1 @ 2 . 3}' prints '{1. 1@2. 3}) - Remove method CompiledMethod>>primitiveNode as it is not used anymore - Fix toolbuilder tests (sort of) - Fix Decompiler>>decompileBlock: (regression of closure fixes). This makes BlockContextTest>>testDecompile pass again - Make BlockContextTest>>testTrace run by commenting out broken part of code simulation Issue 1308: Â Â FixedIdentitySet = fails when compared with an integer
___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Hi Mike Thanks for asking. I removed it because I had the impression it depends on the class XMLWriter that is not in the image. Looking at it again, I see that this is just example code to run the test on. If I change XMLWriter to Object the test run green. I will add it again. Issue 1317: Add MethodHighlightingTests back http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1317 Adrian On Oct 17, 2009, at 11:47 , Michael Roberts wrote:
Hi Adrian is method highlighting test broken or bogus? Was there a reason to not mark it expected failure?
Thanks mike
On Saturday, October 17, 2009, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Issue 1310: Make all tests green (not complete yet) - Remove class MethodHighlightingTests - ParseNode removeSelector: #addCommentToMorph: - Fix SelfEvaluatingObjectTest>>testArray ({1 + 0 . 1 @ 2 . 3}' prints '{1. 1@2. 3}) - Remove method CompiledMethod>>primitiveNode as it is not used anymore - Fix toolbuilder tests (sort of) - Fix Decompiler>>decompileBlock: (regression of closure fixes). This makes BlockContextTest>>testDecompile pass again - Make BlockContextTest>>testTrace run by commenting out broken part of code simulation Issue 1308: FixedIdentitySet = fails when compared with an integer
___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
cool Mike On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Hi Mike
Thanks for asking. I removed it because I had the impression it depends on the class XMLWriter that is not in the image. Looking at it again, I see that this is just example code to run the test on. If I change XMLWriter to Object the test run green. I will add it again.
Issue 1317: Add MethodHighlightingTests back http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1317
Adrian
On Oct 17, 2009, at 11:47 , Michael Roberts wrote:
Hi Adrian is method highlighting test broken or bogus? Was there a reason to not mark it expected failure?
Thanks mike
On Saturday, October 17, 2009, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Issue 1310: Â Â Make all tests green (not complete yet) - Remove class MethodHighlightingTests - ParseNode removeSelector: #addCommentToMorph: - Fix SelfEvaluatingObjectTest>>testArray ({1 + 0 . 1 @ 2 . 3}' prints '{1. 1@2. 3}) - Remove method CompiledMethod>>primitiveNode as it is not used anymore - Fix toolbuilder tests (sort of) - Fix Decompiler>>decompileBlock: (regression of closure fixes). This makes BlockContextTest>>testDecompile pass again - Make BlockContextTest>>testTrace run by commenting out broken part of code simulation Issue 1308: Â Â FixedIdentitySet = fails when compared with an integer
___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
- Make BlockContextTest>>testTrace run by commenting out broken part
of code simulation
Adrian: In 10515 this test sometime fails, but then running it again, it works :(
___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
remove it! Stef On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
- Make BlockContextTest>>testTrace run by commenting out broken part of code simulation
Adrian: In 10515 this test sometime fails, but then running it again, it works :(
___________________ http://www.adrian-lienhard.ch/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Careful, does anyone understand why it works, then why it fails. Is it because the environment changes? Or some subtle issue in blocks? Removing it because it fails doesn't seem like a useful criteria if it's attempted to give us a clue? On 2010-03-19, at 12:41 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
remove it!
Stef
On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
- Make BlockContextTest>>testTrace run by commenting out broken part of code simulation
Adrian: In 10515 this test sometime fails, but then running it again, it works :(
-- =========================================================================== John M. McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> Twitter: squeaker68882 Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com ===========================================================================
John is right. This is an important test. In my work image it works fine. That it fails in Pharo is indicative of some problem with the execution simulation machinery and closures. You're missing some changes. BTW, in my image the class is BlockTest (see attached) 2010/3/19 John M McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com>
Careful, does anyone understand why it works, then why it fails. Is it because the environment changes? Or some subtle issue in blocks? Removing it because it fails doesn't seem like a useful criteria if it's attempted to give us a clue?
On 2010-03-19, at 12:41 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
remove it!
Stef
On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
- Make BlockContextTest>>testTrace run by commenting out broken part of code simulation
Adrian: In 10515 this test sometime fails, but then running it again, it
works :(
-- =========================================================================== John M. McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> Twitter: squeaker68882 Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com ===========================================================================
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Ok thanks but so far this is more than three months that we are in RC and nothing special happened. so this is not a show stopper bug? No? Then when I run it multiple times it is always green. Mariano What do you get when the test is red? in 1.1 this is renamed BlockClosureTest and they are all green even when run multiple times @ elliot methodNodeFormattedAndDecorated: is not found in Pharo1.0 and 1.1 else all the tests are green even when run multiple times. Stef
John is right. This is an important test. In my work image it works fine. That it fails in Pharo is indicative of some problem with the execution simulation machinery and closures. You're missing some changes.
BTW, in my image the class is BlockTest (see attached)
2010/3/19 John M McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> Careful, does anyone understand why it works, then why it fails. Is it because the environment changes? Or some subtle issue in blocks? Removing it because it fails doesn't seem like a useful criteria if it's attempted to give us a clue?
On 2010-03-19, at 12:41 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
remove it!
Stef
On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:02 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
- Make BlockContextTest>>testTrace run by commenting out broken part of code simulation
Adrian: In 10515 this test sometime fails, but then running it again, it works :(
-- =========================================================================== John M. McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> Twitter: squeaker68882 Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com ===========================================================================
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
<BlockTest.st>_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (6)
-
Adrian Lienhard -
Eliot Miranda -
John M McIntosh -
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Michael Roberts -
Stéphane Ducasse