[Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement
I have a draft for a release announcement for Pharo 1.2.1 http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html [ THIS IS A DRAFT !! - DO NOT YET RELEASE ] Please check this for errors and omissions, I will try to integrate the remarks tomorrow. Please check the links as well. I tried to stick with the basics, as one could write about so much (introducing Pharo Smalltalk and its features could be useful, but is quite challenging; everything loaded into dev could be described, and so on). I am sure I am not doing justice to all efforts by everybody, please give feedback. To give it a little twist, I started with a little 'story' called 'Update #12345', maybe it is to geeky, but it felt like a good angle to cover the basics about the process and the time spent. The most useful raw material was this http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ActionsInPharoOneDotTwo It feels as if more could be said about Dev. I also tried to stick with just a simple screenshot, I could come up with more complicated ones, but we cannot put everything on one screenshot. Sven
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be> wrote:
I have a draft for a release announcement for Pharo 1.2.1
    http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html
[ THIS IS A DRAFT !! - DO NOT YET RELEASE ]
Please check this for errors and omissions, I will try to integrate the remarks tomorrow. Please check the links as well.
Great Sven, maybe you could put this information on the wiki so the people could modify it more easily.
I tried to stick with the basics, as one could write about so much (introducing Pharo Smalltalk and its features could be useful, but is quite challenging; everything loaded into dev could be described, and so on). I am sure I am not doing justice to all efforts by everybody, please give feedback.
To give it a little twist, I started with a little 'story' called 'Update #12345', maybe it is to geeky, but it felt like a good angle to cover the basics about the process and the time spent.
The most useful raw material was this http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ActionsInPharoOneDotTwo
It feels as if more could be said about Dev.
Stéphane already suggest to look at all the issues solved during 1.2: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=milestone=1.2 http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=Milestone%3D1.2-DevImage The related issues could be added before the description of the changes: #2943, #3036 SUnit 4 integration For future releases, i guess a semi-automatic changelog could be done with the list of issues. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be> wrote:
I have a draft for a release announcement for Pharo 1.2.1
    http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html
[ THIS IS A DRAFT !! - DO NOT YET RELEASE ]
Please check this for errors and omissions, I will try to integrate the remarks tomorrow. Please check the links as well.
Great Sven, maybe you could put this information on the wiki so the people could modify it more easily.
I tried to stick with the basics, as one could write about so much (introducing Pharo Smalltalk and its features could be useful, but is quite challenging; everything loaded into dev could be described, and so on). I am sure I am not doing justice to all efforts by everybody, please give feedback.
To give it a little twist, I started with a little 'story' called 'Update #12345', maybe it is to geeky, but it felt like a good angle to cover the basics about the process and the time spent.
The most useful raw material was this http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ActionsInPharoOneDotTwo
It feels as if more could be said about Dev.
Stéphane already suggest to look at all the issues solved during 1.2:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=milestone=1.2 http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/list?can=1&q=Milestone%3D1.2-DevImage
The related issues could be added before the description of the changes: #2943, #3036 SUnit 4 integration
For future releases, i guess a semi-automatic changelog could be done with the list of issues.
This is quite difficult now to know exactly from the list of issues which one have been integrated effectively in 1.2 or not. Some issues are closed, some other are their fix/enhancements integrated in the image. Maybe for future releases, when a fix/enhancements is accepted, the issue could be tagged with a label like : in1.3 The idea is to be able to extract the list of updates directly from issues. What do you think about that ? Regards -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be>wrote:
I have a draft for a release announcement for Pharo 1.2.1
Cool ! I will do a french translation this evening. Remarks: - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 Cheers, Laurent.
[ THIS IS A DRAFT !! - DO NOT YET RELEASE ]
Please check this for errors and omissions, I will try to integrate the remarks tomorrow. Please check the links as well.
I tried to stick with the basics, as one could write about so much (introducing Pharo Smalltalk and its features could be useful, but is quite challenging; everything loaded into dev could be described, and so on). I am sure I am not doing justice to all efforts by everybody, please give feedback.
To give it a little twist, I started with a little 'story' called 'Update #12345', maybe it is to geeky, but it felt like a good angle to cover the basics about the process and the time spent.
The most useful raw material was this http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ActionsInPharoOneDotTwo
It feels as if more could be said about Dev.
I also tried to stick with just a simple screenshot, I could come up with more complicated ones, but we cannot put everything on one screenshot.
Sven
Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. Is there an easy why to know this? cheers mariano On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be> wrote:
On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote:
Remarks: - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2
Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version.
More comments ?
Sven
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
On 05 Apr 2011, at 09:47, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. Is there an easy why to know this?
Yeah, it would be cool to add some statistics, like N fixes or commits, R issues solved, reduced the core complexity from X classes and Y methods to X' classes and Y' methods, but I cannot easily get to that. Is it not so that 1.2 started with #12000 and that we are now on #12345, so that makes 345 version tags, but of course not all of them are of equal size/importance. If we can't get this half right, we probably better drop it, no ?
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be>wrote:
On 05 Apr 2011, at 09:47, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. Is there an easy why to know this?
Yeah, it would be cool to add some statistics, like N fixes or commits, R issues solved, reduced the core complexity from X classes and Y methods to X' classes and Y' methods, but I cannot easily get to that.
Is it not so that 1.2 started with #12000 and that we are now on #12345, so that makes 345 version tags, but of course not all of them are of equal size/importance.
If we can't get this half right, we probably better drop it, no ?
Just a little note. #12345 is not the number of issues, but for updates. If we take that every update has an average o 3 integrated issues, then the amount of issues should be something like 1000 :) (345 * 3) -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be>wrote:
On 05 Apr 2011, at 09:47, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. Is there an easy why to know this?
Yeah, it would be cool to add some statistics, like N fixes or commits, R issues solved, reduced the core complexity from X classes and Y methods to X' classes and Y' methods, but I cannot easily get to that.
Is it not so that 1.2 started with #12000 and that we are now on #12345, so that makes 345 version tags, but of course not all of them are of equal size/importance.
ahaha I thought revision #12345 was a dummy number :) Laurent
If we can't get this half right, we probably better drop it, no ?
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com>wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be>wrote:
On 05 Apr 2011, at 09:47, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
Thanks Sven. I would like to remark the ammount of fixes issues. Is there an easy why to know this?
Yeah, it would be cool to add some statistics, like N fixes or commits, R issues solved, reduced the core complexity from X classes and Y methods to X' classes and Y' methods, but I cannot easily get to that.
Is it not so that 1.2 started with #12000 and that we are now on #12345, so that makes 345 version tags, but of course not all of them are of equal size/importance.
ahaha I thought revision #12345 was a dummy number :)
NOO, it was MAGIC! We CANNOT not release this image....that number means something :)
Laurent
If we can't get this half right, we probably better drop it, no ?
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 19AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote:
Remarks: - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2
Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version.
More comments ?
Sven
I would remove the SimpleMorphic mention, or at least add a disclaimer to it that it's more like a preview of what direction Morphic will be heading in, rather than something people should use, and can expect to work and/or stay in the base image. Cheers, Henry
On 05 Apr 2011, at 11:19, Henrik Johansen wrote:
I would remove the SimpleMorphic mention, or at least add a disclaimer to it that it's more like a preview of what direction Morphic will be heading in, rather than something people should use, and can expect to work and/or stay in the base image.
I'll phrase it as 'Included SimpleMorphic preview' then.
I ill have a look when I get a little moment. Stef On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote:
Remarks: - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2
Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version.
More comments ?
Sven
I'm currently translating into french. I do not understand this: "Made sure that Smalltalk globals is used instead of Smalltalk" Can someone explain ? Laurent On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>wrote:
I ill have a look when I get a little moment.
Stef
On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote:
Remarks: - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood,
...
- Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2
Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version.
More comments ?
Sven
On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:41 PM, laurent laffont wrote:
I'm currently translating into french.
I do not understand this: "Made sure that Smalltalk globals is used instead of Smalltalk"
Better support for the introduction of SmalltalkImage and SystemDictionary separation.
Can someone explain ?
Laurent
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote: I ill have a look when I get a little moment.
Stef
On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote:
Remarks: - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2
Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version.
More comments ?
Sven
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:41 PM, laurent laffont wrote:
I'm currently translating into french.
I do not understand this: "Made sure that Smalltalk globals is used instead of Smalltalk"
Better support for the introduction of SmalltalkImage and SystemDictionary separation.
OK. So this separation is a work in progress ? I do not understand this one too: Migrated to MethodReferenceWithSource and friends Laurent
Can someone explain ?
Laurent
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <
stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
I ill have a look when I get a little moment.
Stef
On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote:
Remarks: - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the
hood, ...
- Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2
Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version.
More comments ?
Sven
On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:58 PM, laurent laffont wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:41 PM, laurent laffont wrote:
I'm currently translating into french.
I do not understand this: "Made sure that Smalltalk globals is used instead of Smalltalk"
Better support for the introduction of SmalltalkImage and SystemDictionary separation.
OK. So this separation is a work in progress ?
No this is done now there are a couple a message that should be deprecated in SmalltalkImage because they are in SystemDictionary. This action started in Squeak 3.9 .... no comment.
I do not understand this one too:
Migrated to MethodReferenceWithSource and friends
The tools managing MethodReference (bad ones) needed to use the MethodReferenceWithSource hack.
Laurent
Can someone explain ?
Laurent
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote: I ill have a look when I get a little moment.
Stef
On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote:
Remarks: - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2
Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version.
More comments ?
Sven
OK, the board approved the draft, so here is the 1.2.1 release announcement: http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html Adrian will put it on the website, next an official mail should be sent to the mailing lists. Then we should all try to spread the word! Even if it was a bit long winding in the end, this is a release to be proud of. Sven
thanks a lot :) I was thinking that we could do a much faster 1.3 release. We could start to freeze it soon and remove RPackage from the list. Stef
OK, the board approved the draft, so here is the 1.2.1 release announcement:
http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html
Adrian will put it on the website, next an official mail should be sent to the mailing lists.
Then we should all try to spread the word!
Even if it was a bit long winding in the end, this is a release to be proud of.
Sven
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be> wrote:
OK, the board approved the draft, so here is the 1.2.1 release announcement:
http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html
Adrian will put it on the website, next an official mail should be sent to the mailing lists.
Then we should all try to spread the word!
Even if it was a bit long winding in the end, this is a release to be proud of.
French translation here: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Pharo12FrenchAnnouncement Laurent
Sven
I suggest some corrections at: "DEVImageWorkspaces openExternalProjectWorkspace". O2 does not install according to instructions and installing it other ways result in error. Aida has pending dependencies (Swazoo, I guess because Seaside installs Swazoo2) etc. Best regards, CdAB
Laurent, i proof check a little bit what you have done and remove some typos. On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:37 AM, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be> wrote:
OK, the board approved the draft, so here is the 1.2.1 release announcement:
    http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html
Adrian will put it on the website, next an official mail should be sent to the mailing lists.
Then we should all try to spread the word!
Even if it was a bit long winding in the end, this is a release to be proud of.
French translation here: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Pharo12FrenchAnnouncement
Laurent
Sven
-- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com
wrote:
Laurent, i proof check a little bit what you have done and remove some typos.
Thanks. Annoucement submitted to http://linuxfr.org/. Laurent.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:37 AM, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be> wrote:
OK, the board approved the draft, so here is the 1.2.1 release announcement:
http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html
Adrian will put it on the website, next an official mail should be sent
to
the mailing lists.
Then we should all try to spread the word!
Even if it was a bit long winding in the end, this is a release to be proud of.
French translation here: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Pharo12FrenchAnnouncement
Laurent
Sven
-- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
But when are we going to send this mail to this mailing list? and pharo-users? etc... On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:58 AM, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com>wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Serge Stinckwich < serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
Laurent, i proof check a little bit what you have done and remove some typos.
Thanks. Annoucement submitted to http://linuxfr.org/.
Laurent.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:37 AM, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be> wrote:
OK, the board approved the draft, so here is the 1.2.1 release announcement:
http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html
Adrian will put it on the website, next an official mail should be sent
to
the mailing lists.
Then we should all try to spread the word!
Even if it was a bit long winding in the end, this is a release to be proud of.
French translation here: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Pharo12FrenchAnnouncement
Laurent
Sven
-- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Maybe you should wait until the official announcement is made here. Regards, On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:58 PM, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
Laurent, i proof check a little bit what you have done and remove some typos.
Thanks. Annoucement submitted to http://linuxfr.org/. Laurent.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:37 AM, laurent laffont <laurent.laffont@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@beta9.be> wrote:
OK, the board approved the draft, so here is the 1.2.1 release announcement:
    http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html
Adrian will put it on the website, next an official mail should be sent to the mailing lists.
Then we should all try to spread the word!
Even if it was a bit long winding in the end, this is a release to be proud of.
French translation here: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/Pharo12FrenchAnnouncement
Laurent
Sven
-- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
-- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
Thanks, Sven! I've put the page online - as a blog entry on the news page: http://www.pharo-project.org/news - the release page: http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/release-1-2-1 (I've slightly edited some of the bullet point items to fit on one line) Thanks Laurent for the translation. I've linked to the wiki page you created. As far as I see there's one thing missing on the website: the download sticker for the one click image (top right on the page) still points to 1.1.1. I'll try to change the sticker and link tomorrow morning. Regarding the one click image, on the download page we linked to 1.1.1 with and without COG. Do we still have this distinction? Cheers, Adrian On Apr 5, 2011, at 21:15 , Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
OK, the board approved the draft, so here is the 1.2.1 release announcement:
http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html
Adrian will put it on the website, next an official mail should be sent to the mailing lists.
Then we should all try to spread the word!
Even if it was a bit long winding in the end, this is a release to be proud of.
Sven
On Apr 5, 2011, at 22:27 , Adrian Lienhard wrote:
As far as I see there's one thing missing on the website: the download sticker for the one click image (top right on the page) still points to 1.1.1. I'll try to change the sticker and link tomorrow morning.
The new sticker is online. I've linked to the non-COG one-click image. Is that what we want? I've also updated the one-click image links on http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download So, as far as I can tell, the website is ready. Cheers Adrian
I think this part is wrong (see screenshot) On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
On Apr 5, 2011, at 22:27 , Adrian Lienhard wrote:
As far as I see there's one thing missing on the website: the download sticker for the one click image (top right on the page) still points to 1.1.1. I'll try to change the sticker and link tomorrow morning.
The new sticker is online. I've linked to the non-COG one-click image. Is that what we want?
I've also updated the one-click image links on http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download
So, as far as I can tell, the website is ready.
Cheers Adrian
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Thanks for checking, Mariano. I fixed it. Adrian On Apr 6, 2011, at 10:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
I think this part is wrong (see screenshot)
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote: On Apr 5, 2011, at 22:27 , Adrian Lienhard wrote:
As far as I see there's one thing missing on the website: the download sticker for the one click image (top right on the page) still points to 1.1.1. I'll try to change the sticker and link tomorrow morning.
The new sticker is online. I've linked to the non-COG one-click image. Is that what we want?
I've also updated the one-click image links on http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download
So, as far as I can tell, the website is ready.
Cheers Adrian
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
<Screen shot 2011-04-06 at 10.08.49 AM.png>
But when are we going to send this mail to this mailing list? and pharo-users? etc... can we start to buzz arround ? On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Thanks for checking, Mariano. I fixed it.
Adrian
On Apr 6, 2011, at 10:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
I think this part is wrong (see screenshot)
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote: On Apr 5, 2011, at 22:27 , Adrian Lienhard wrote:
As far as I see there's one thing missing on the website: the download sticker for the one click image (top right on the page) still points to 1.1.1. I'll try to change the sticker and link tomorrow morning.
The new sticker is online. I've linked to the non-COG one-click image. Is that what we want?
I've also updated the one-click image links on http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download
So, as far as I can tell, the website is ready.
Cheers Adrian
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
<Screen shot 2011-04-06 at 10.08.49 AM.png>
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com
wrote:
But when are we going to send this mail to this mailing list? and pharo-users? etc... can we start to buzz arround ?
I've started :) http://linuxfr.org/news/pharo12 Laurent.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
Thanks for checking, Mariano. I fixed it.
Adrian
On Apr 6, 2011, at 10:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
I think this part is wrong (see screenshot)
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote: On Apr 5, 2011, at 22:27 , Adrian Lienhard wrote:
As far as I see there's one thing missing on the website: the download sticker for the one click image (top right on the page) still points to 1.1.1. I'll try to change the sticker and link tomorrow morning.
The new sticker is online. I've linked to the non-COG one-click image. Is that what we want?
I've also updated the one-click image links on http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download
So, as far as I can tell, the website is ready.
Cheers Adrian
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
<Screen shot 2011-04-06 at 10.08.49 AM.png>
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
I guess, the question is, *who* is sending the ANN mail?! It's not breaking news anymore, but we should still send one ;) Shall I do it? Adrian On Apr 6, 2011, at 15:47 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
But when are we going to send this mail to this mailing list? and pharo-users? etc... can we start to buzz arround ?
Please! Stef On Apr 6, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
I guess, the question is, *who* is sending the ANN mail?!
It's not breaking news anymore, but we should still send one ;)
Shall I do it?
Adrian
On Apr 6, 2011, at 15:47 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
But when are we going to send this mail to this mailing list? and pharo-users? etc... can we start to buzz arround ?
Thanks, Sven That's a great summary! Adrian On Apr 4, 2011, at 23:01 , Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
I have a draft for a release announcement for Pharo 1.2.1
http://homepage.mac.com/svc/Pharo/pharo-1.2.1-release.html
[ THIS IS A DRAFT !! - DO NOT YET RELEASE ]
Please check this for errors and omissions, I will try to integrate the remarks tomorrow. Please check the links as well.
I tried to stick with the basics, as one could write about so much (introducing Pharo Smalltalk and its features could be useful, but is quite challenging; everything loaded into dev could be described, and so on). I am sure I am not doing justice to all efforts by everybody, please give feedback.
To give it a little twist, I started with a little 'story' called 'Update #12345', maybe it is to geeky, but it felt like a good angle to cover the basics about the process and the time spent.
The most useful raw material was this http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ActionsInPharoOneDotTwo
It feels as if more could be said about Dev.
I also tried to stick with just a simple screenshot, I could come up with more complicated ones, but we cannot put everything on one screenshot.
Sven
participants (8)
-
Adrian Lienhard -
Casimiro de Almeida Barreto -
Henrik Johansen -
laurent laffont -
Mariano Martinez Peck -
Serge Stinckwich -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Sven Van Caekenberghe