[Pharo-project] [update 2.0] #20158
20158 ----- - Issue 6135: Code completion in all tools. Thanks Sean De Nigris. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6135 - Issue 6091: FileReference>>extension should be after last separator. Thanks Sean De Nigris. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6091 - Issue 6086: Running tests with test runner is very slow due to progress bar. Tx http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6086 - Issue 6092: Clean Chronology tests.Thanks Sean De Nigris. http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6092
Tests Guard report: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/TestsGuard we have 3 new failing tests - KernelTests.Chronology.DateAndTimeTest.testDosEpoch - KernelTests.Chronology.DateAndTimeTest.testSecondsAcrossTimeZones - KernelTests.Chronology.DateAndTimeTest.testSqueakEpoch -- Pavel On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
20158 -----
- Issue 6135: Â Code completion in all tools. Thanks Sean De Nigris. Â Â Â Â http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6135
- Issue 6091: Â FileReference>>extension should be after last separator. Thanks Sean De Nigris. Â Â Â Â http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6091
- Issue 6086:  Running tests with test runner is very slow due to progress bar. Tx     http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6086
- Issue 6092: Â Clean Chronology tests.Thanks Sean De Nigris. Â Â Â Â http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=6092
Pavel Krivanek-3 wrote
we have 3 new failing tests - KernelTests.Chronology.DateAndTimeTest.testDosEpoch - KernelTests.Chronology.DateAndTimeTest.testSecondsAcrossTimeZones - KernelTests.Chronology.DateAndTimeTest.testSqueakEpoch
If we can live with these, they actually should be failing. The first one, I'm still deciding what to do about (either change the implementation or the test). The second two are dependent on "Issue 6089: [BUG]: Epoch handled incorrectly", which I've been working on, but I'm still thinking through the ramifications of my changes. If anyone wants to work together, lmk... Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/update-2-0-20158-tp4636308p4636542.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Can you, please, open an issue and write your comments there? On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Pavel Krivanek-3 wrote
we have 3 new failing tests - KernelTests.Chronology.DateAndTimeTest.testDosEpoch - KernelTests.Chronology.DateAndTimeTest.testSecondsAcrossTimeZones - KernelTests.Chronology.DateAndTimeTest.testSqueakEpoch
If we can live with these, they actually should be failing. The first one, I'm still deciding what to do about (either change the implementation or the test). The second two are dependent on "Issue 6089: Â Â [BUG]: Epoch handled incorrectly", which I've been working on, but I'm still thinking through the ramifications of my changes. If anyone wants to work together, lmk...
Sean
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/update-2-0-20158-tp4636308p4636542.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Pavel Krivanek-3 wrote
Can you, please, open an issue and write your comments there?
Issue 6156: TestGuard for 2.0 #20158 -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/update-2-0-20158-tp4636308p4636570.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
participants (3)
-
Pavel Krivanek -
Sean P. DeNigris -
Stéphane Ducasse