[Pharo-project] Why 3 projects ?
Stef, i was wondering : why not use just one SqueakSource project (Pharo) instead of three (Pharo, PharoInbox, PharoTreated) ? You are worrying about the scalability ? You just need to select from time to time which package will be blessed and include them in the official update list. -- Serge Stinckwich http://blog.doesnotunderstand.org/
I think it makes a lot of sense. Pharo is the current release. PharoInbox helps the admins to keep track of what needs to be blessed. PharoTreeted is the archive. Otherwise you can easily lose track of what needs to be done. Simple and effective. - on On May 28, 2008, at 11:13, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
Stef, i was wondering : why not use just one SqueakSource project (Pharo) instead of three (Pharo, PharoInbox, PharoTreated) ? You are worrying about the scalability ? You just need to select from time to time which package will be blessed and include them in the official update list.
-- Serge Stinckwich http://blog.doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
I prefer to make clear separation like that in the repository we will not have branches. Stef On May 28, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
Stef, i was wondering : why not use just one SqueakSource project (Pharo) instead of three (Pharo, PharoInbox, PharoTreated) ? You are worrying about the scalability ? You just need to select from time to time which package will be blessed and include them in the official update list.
-- Serge Stinckwich http://blog.doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
Yes and not published but not used packages in inbox and pharo. Stef On May 28, 2008, at 12:36 PM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote:
I think it makes a lot of sense.
Pharo is the current release.
PharoInbox helps the admins to keep track of what needs to be blessed. PharoTreeted is the archive.
Otherwise you can easily lose track of what needs to be done. Simple and effective.
- on
On May 28, 2008, at 11:13, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
Stef, i was wondering : why not use just one SqueakSource project (Pharo) instead of three (Pharo, PharoInbox, PharoTreated) ? You are worrying about the scalability ? You just need to select from time to time which package will be blessed and include them in the official update list.
-- Serge Stinckwich http://blog.doesnotunderstand.org/
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
participants (3)
-
Oscar Nierstrasz -
Serge Stinckwich -
Stéphane Ducasse