Showstopper to upgrade to 3.0
Hi guys, I was talking with Thierry about gitfiletree and saving big packages and after some tests I've perceived that gitfiletree in a 3.0 Pharo image performs quite well. Moving to 3.0 sounds that will improve productivity and workflow. The problem for me is I can't upgrade to 3.0 The thing that is currently stopping me is FFI (is not loading in the current 3.0) :( sebastian o/ PD: the plan is to put a pharo 3.0 worker with a controlled airflowing account and see how behaves
On 16 Dec 2013, at 16:52, Sebastian Sastre <sebastian@flowingconcept.com> wrote:
Hi guys,
I was talking with Thierry about gitfiletree and saving big packages and after some tests I've perceived that gitfiletree in a 3.0 Pharo image performs quite well.
Moving to 3.0 sounds that will improve productivity and workflow.
The problem for me is I can't upgrade to 3.0
The thing that is currently stopping me is FFI (is not loading in the current 3.0)
Yes, estebant told me last week. We need to evaluate. The whole problem of the âFFI as a loadable projectâ is that it is actually needs *parser* level changes⦠which of course if you do not have it in the system are easily overlooked. I will put an issue on the issue tracker... Marcus
me want FFI :D I'd very much like to test any candidate version about this thanks! sebastian o/ On Dec 16, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 16 Dec 2013, at 16:52, Sebastian Sastre <sebastian@flowingconcept.com> wrote:
Hi guys,
I was talking with Thierry about gitfiletree and saving big packages and after some tests I've perceived that gitfiletree in a 3.0 Pharo image performs quite well.
Moving to 3.0 sounds that will improve productivity and workflow.
The problem for me is I can't upgrade to 3.0
The thing that is currently stopping me is FFI (is not loading in the current 3.0)
Yes, estebant told me last week. We need to evaluate.
The whole problem of the âFFI as a loadable projectâ is that it is actually needs *parser* level changes⦠which of course if you do not have it in the system are easily overlooked.
I will put an issue on the issue tracker...
Marcus
On 17 Dec 2013, at 12:12, Sebastian Sastre <sebastian@flowingconcept.com> wrote:
me want FFI :D
I'd very much like to test any candidate version about this
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12438/Old-FFI-Check-that-it-is-parsed-corr... The first step is that we need a description of how to load FFI that riggers the problem. Marcus
participants (2)
-
Marcus Denker -
Sebastian Sastre