Stability takes at least two forms: the system works AND is not going to experience violent change. Given that more of the latter is possible/expected, it might be better to start at 0.1. Bill Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D. University of Florida Department of Anesthesiology PO Box 100254 Gainesville, FL 32610-0254 Email: bschwab@anest.ufl.edu Tel: (352) 273-6785 FAX: (352) 392-7029

...

...

adi@netstyle.ch 09/25/08 5:21 AM >>>

On Sep 25, 2008, at 11:12 , Damien Cassou wrote:

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:

...

I'd suggest the common major.minor[.maintenance] scheme starting with "1.0".

I would not start with "1.0" because it means this is already stable enough for anyone to rely upon.

isn't this exactly the goal of the release?! Only if the shipped version is reasonably stable the people will use it... Adrian _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project