Re: [Pharo-project] Tracing bugs/corrections/regressions ... in Pharo
On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
2011/2/1 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>:
Maybe I had some bad luck with http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3468 Or is there many examples of issues closed without a clue ?
In a case like that, the changeset was just merged in the release.
The test is failing, as you can see:
https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/lastCompletedB...
This is probably because you must (Object recompile: #perform:withArguments:)
The 1.3 core image was recompiled completely around 13020... Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
2011/2/1 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
2011/2/1 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>:
Maybe I had some bad luck with http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3468 Or is there many examples of issues closed without a clue ?
In a case like that, the changeset was just merged in the release.
The test is failing, as you can see:
https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/lastCompletedB...
This is probably because you must   (Object recompile: #perform:withArguments:)
The 1.3 core image was recompiled completely around 13020...
    Marcus
-- Marcus Denker  -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
Strange, the change worked for me in Squeak once I recompiled. Nicolas
On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:58 37AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
2011/2/1 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
2011/2/1 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>:
Maybe I had some bad luck with http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3468 Or is there many examples of issues closed without a clue ?
In a case like that, the changeset was just merged in the release.
The test is failing, as you can see:
https://pharo-ic.lille.inria.fr/hudson/job/Pharo%20Core%201.3/lastCompletedB...
This is probably because you must (Object recompile: #perform:withArguments:)
The 1.3 core image was recompiled completely around 13020...
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.
Strange, the change worked for me in Squeak once I recompiled.
Nicolas
#perform:withArguments: works in Pharo as well, Igor's fix for it was applied back in May: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2443 What it doesn't fix (and which the test in 3468 highlights), are arbitrary sends to #perform: withArguments: inSuperclass: (Ie. the compiler does not expand frame size of all senders, nor does the test run on a VM which does not error with many arguments) #perform:withArguments: just happend to be the most likely sender to run into it. Cheers, Henry
participants (3)
-
Henrik Johansen -
Marcus Denker -
Nicolas Cellier