Me too. I would rollback until we have a better solution and very well tested. I think right now the consequences and worst than the original problem. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Marcus Denker <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:marcus.denker@inria.fr">marcus.denker@inria.fr</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im"><br>
On May 13, 2011, at 12:24 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; 1) have a fast/normal recompileAll<br>
&gt; 2) not to loose source code<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; If the only way right now is rollbacking #dropSourcePointer and rollbacking the implementation in objects as methods, please do it. Right now we are in the worst case. For example, today when I discover the bug of loosing sources...I commit my own package with a lots of methods with the decompiled source...it took time to fix it. �So I think it is important to fix this.<br>

&gt;<br>
</div>I think we should roll back the change for now...<br>
<br>
All this shows that the source handling is *far* too complex... How would we realize source handling *today* considering today&#39;s resources? (aka: compression is free and memory even<br>
on last year&#39;s cell phone 20 times larger than our complete system...)<br>
<br>
 � � � �Marcus<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Marcus Denker �-- <a href="http://www.marcusdenker.de" target="_blank">http://www.marcusdenker.de</a><br>
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mariano<br><a href="http://marianopeck.wordpress.com" target="_blank">http://marianopeck.wordpress.com</a><br><br>