On 04.12.2014, at 10:09, kilon alios <kilon.alios@gmail.com> wrote:

"I��m not sure we need to discuss that, since there already is FileSystem-Git which *is* an implementation of Git in Smalltalkt..."

is ? really ? wow I am impressed I thought reimplementing git in smalltalk would be a huge effort. Pharo surprises me once more :)

Well, it��s not complete, far fromit actually. Git is huge�� (also, see my response to Thierry)

so the problem now is to build the tools on top of it to utilize git ?

Yes, but the tools should use libgit2 bindings, not the Smalltalk implementation.

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 04.12.2014, at 09:47, kilon alios <kilon.alios@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> What are the benefits that justify the effort to reimplementing git in smalltalk ?
>

I��m not sure we need to discuss that, since there already is FileSystem-Git which *is* an implementation of Git in Smalltalkt...