2014-01-29 Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com>

Nicolai Hess wrote

> And I don't like the name either.
> I would prefere Binding or ValueBinding.

Guys, I don't love the name either, but can we do a little better than "I
don't like it". The purpose of ValueHolder's existence was to notify changes
to its value. A reactive variable, from FRP, kinda-sorta does that. How does
Binding = 'I will notify of changes to my value'?!

-----
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Issues-12717-and-12684-tp4739761p4740024.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

We don't need to argue about names,

ReactiveVariable is not wrong, I just don't like it:-)

�

I just wanted to emphase on the missing discussion.

Doing this change after the Pharo3 release may be more

difficult than now. Even if it is a bit late.

So, I am happy we have at least both. (We should

try to force the use of the new name.)

�

(Binding or PropertyBinding is how it is called in

QTs QML)

�

Nicolai