A patch mechanism ?

That would be cool indeed, although probably not doable in all cases.

On 25 Jun 2014, at 10:23, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:

> Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could install packages from a ticket in the image? Something like
>
> - get 3.0 image
> - fix from issue 12345 and issue 45678 and...
> - install own own packages
> - deploy
>
> It would be so well documented :)
>
> Norbert
>
> Am 25.06.2014 um 08:47 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
>
>> I only did it in 3.0
>> The file out is attached to the slice - it is 100% standalone
>>
>> On 25 Jun 2014, at 00:45, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
>>
>>> thank you, Sven. Did you try this in 3.0, too. I would need it there!
>>>
>>> Norbert
>>>
>>>> Am 25.06.2014 um 00:11 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu>:
>>>>
>>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13395/Add-SHA256-HashFunction
>>>>
>>>> cleaned up, documented, properly packaged.
>>>>
>>>> Passes some test vectors.
>>>>
>>>> I changed the handling of the empty stream.
>>>>
>>>>> On 24 Jun 2014, at 23:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jan,
>>>>>
>>>>> I loaded just the class CFSHA256 and it worked perfectly (I didn't expect anything else).
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried some examples from Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sha256#Examples_of_SHA-2_variants):
>>>>>
>>>>> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog') hex. 'd7a8fbb307d7809469ca9abcb0082e4f8d5651e46d3cdb762d02d0bf37c9e592'
>>>>>
>>>>> (CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.') hex. 'ef537f25c895bfa782526529a9b63d97aa631564d5d789c2b765448c8635fb6c'
>>>>>
>>>>> So I will rename the class to SHA256, moving it to System-Hashing and add SHA256Tests for starters.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sven
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 20 Jun 2014, at 17:01, Jan van de Sandt <jvdsandt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I added the SHA256 class to Cloudfork a few years ago. The class was mostly copied from the Cryptography [1] project.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Jan.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Fran��ois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Max,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC so). I'm no expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base implementation". Someone with more knowledge can probably tell ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sven,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The bare minimum to load it is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gofer it
>>>>>> smalltalkhubUser: 'JanVanDeSandt' project: 'Cloudfork';
>>>>>> package: 'Cloudfork-Common';
>>>>>> package: 'Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform';
>>>>>> load.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The implementation is in Cloudfork-Pharo-Platform.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
>>>>>> I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, Fran��ois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of view to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 class) in the System-Hashing package (in ��where there's already SHA1 and MD5) ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can Cloudfork HMAC-SHA256 be easily parameterized with, say, an SHA256 base implementation? Or does it require extra stuff? In the former case I probably wouldn���t add it. In the latter case it���s open for discussion. Personally, I think it belongs into a separate package, not into System-Hashing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Max
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>