We should not revert whole update so I created an issue:��
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/19338/Revert-18233-improving-Pragma-API

-- Pavel

2016-11-14 14:30 GMT+01:00 Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com>:
Agreed. So who is doing it?

Doru


> On Nov 14, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> we need to revert.
> this is a huge mess in a very inappropriate moment :)
>
> Esteban
>
>> On 14 Nov 2016, at 13:56, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Indeed, I forgot that #selector is doing something else. This is a bit of a mess. Either we revert it today, or we leave it. Otherwise, more projects will adopt the new API only to break again afterwards.
>>
>> Doru
>>
>>> On Nov 14, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14/11/2016 13:44, Tudor Girba wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Please do not revert the API. Just comment out the deprecation. The code in Moose was already updated to the new API and I presume other projects might be in the same situation.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Doru
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> www.tudorgirba.com
>>>> www.feenk.com
>>>>
>>>> "Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Changing the API without a deprecation phase is bad. This kind of
>>> breaking change without warning is something companies can fear. This is
>>> even more important when there is such a dangerous change. #selector is
>>> still here but do something different��� This is bad to just change it in
>>> one go.
>>>
>>> Maybe some projects updated but most companies do not follow the
>>> development version of Pharo.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cyril Ferlicot
>>>
>>> http://www.synectique.eu
>>>
>>> 2 rue Jacques Pr��vert 01,
>>> 59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France
>>
>> --
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> www.feenk.com
>>
>> "It's not how it is, it is how we see it."
>>
>>
>
>

--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com

"Don't give to get. Just give."