I hate not having a real namespace. I hate to call my class DBXConnection instead of Connection. I think namespaces are very useful. Something like Java packages or similar would be grate for me.

Cheers,

Mariano

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Travis Kay <tlk@nb.sympatico.ca> wrote:
Bill Schwab wrote:
> Stef,
>
> Re Dolphin, class categories have long been of marginal use; I'll speak for myself on that but suspect others would agree.
I am a Dolphin Pro, Squeak and Pharo users, I agree.

Travis

> Packages are of course extremely useful.  Method categories are also quite useful, and Dolphin allows multiple categories to be assigned to a given method.  Dolphin mixes virtual categories (computed by rules) with static ones maintained by the user (and serialized as part of packages).
>
> I can easily see where OB would get quite a speed boost out of it.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
>
> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
> University of Florida
> Department of Anesthesiology
> PO Box 100254
> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
>
> Email: bschwab@anest.ufl.edu
> Tel: (352) 273-6785
> FAX: (352) 392-7029
>
>
>
>>>> stephane.ducasse@inria.fr 2/10/2009 4:41:10 PM >>>
>>>>
> Alexandre implemented long time ago an hybrid model where both kind of
> packages could coexist
> and we should probably revive it for 1.1
>
> Stef
> On Feb 10, 2009, at 10:28 PM, Michael van der Gulik wrote:
>
>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, David R�thlisberger <squeak@webcitas.ch
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>> So if we had real packages in Pharo as first class entities, OB
>> would be much faster
>> and simpler to maintain. Right now, OB models packages and class
>> cats itself, has to
>> take the information from both the Monticello's working copy
>> managers and the
>> SystemOrganizer. This is a mess and a huge pain, but what can we do.
>> We should really invest in bringing real packages to Pharo.
>>
>>
>> If you want "real" packages, I've implemented them in Squeak:
>>
>> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/Namespaces
>> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/Packages
>>
>> The places the code is held, including a video and a Squeak image is
>> linked from here:
>> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/SecureSqueak
>>
>> I'm not interested in Pharo, but the code is there and is released
>> under the MIT license if anybody else wants it.
>>
>> Gulik.
>>
>> --
>> http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg
>> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.20/1943 - Release Date: 02/10/09 07:20:00
>
>


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project