Marcus,
I can't install Seaside on Pharo 1.1(*) but then i'll try again at home.

It isn't my point to compare Pharo to Squeak performance but I used Squeak to test this particular situation.�

Thank you,

Facu

(*) it's very slow to write the log taking minutes to complete the instalation

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:

On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:

>
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:37 PM, Facundo Vozzi wrote:
>
>> Lukas,
>> It happens on my machine with Windows/(Firefox-Chrome-IE 8) and Pharo.
>>
>> But I test it on the same machine with Squeak 4.1 RC4 and it go very very fast
>> to open de smalltalk debugger.
>> Furthermore, Squeak 4.1 RC4 seem to be faster than Pharo, did you note that too or it's only my sensations?
>>
>
> Did you check with Pharo 1.1?
>
> � � � https://gforge.inria.fr/frs/download.php/26762/PharoCore-1.1-11301-UNSTABLE.1.zip
>
> In general, Squeak 4.1 should not be compared to Pharo 1.0 speed-wise, but Pharo 1.1
>

My theory for your bug is that it's this:

� � � �http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=860

We added it to 1.1 on Nov. 01, 2009. Not to 1.0, because 1.0 was supposed to be released
"very soon".

� � � �Marcus



--
Marcus Denker �-- http://www.marcusdenker.de
INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project



--
Facundo Vozzi
InfOil S.A.
Project Leader
(+54-11) 4542-9999 x108
fvozzi@infoil.com.ar