Hi,

I encountered some annotations in the form:

�� < expr: (foo) result: bar >

and some meta comments of the form:

�� " foo >>> bar "

I think both are aimed at providing examples of method usage for documentation, non regression testing, etc...

I note that the former is requiring a literal result, which is quite limiting (1/3) is not a literal for example, 0@0 neither...

IMO it should be extended for handling any valid expression.

But that still makes two different ways of expressing the same intent. So what's the canonical one?