cool!
I tried and it worked for the "long method" rule (as in the example), but I could not make it work for "Message sent not implemented", do you know why? Maybe I have to put the message not implemented in the pragma? how?
Also, how do you specify a false positive on a class, not on methods? (for example "Class not referenced")
And for variables? (for example "Variables not referenced")

Thanks!
Hernan.

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:35 AM, St�phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/SmallLintPharoFixing


On May 19, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote:

> Hi,
> �some years ago I ported a tool we created in VisualAge called
> ExpectedSmallLintFailures to Squeak (http://map.squeak.org/package/25c17dc0-bf31-4215-8ba9-bf0df8157449
> )
> �That tool allows to register expected smalllint failures to avoid
> getting false positives everytime you run smalllint. I tried to load
> it yesterday in pharo and I had some problems �because SmallLint's
> design has changed a lot (I like it much better the way it is now).
> I could loaded it finally, but it does not run.
> �So, is there a way to register false positives in the "new small
> lint"?
> �I'd like to know also if there is a way to run just the bugs or a
> specific rule (and not all the smalllint rules) using the code
> critics UI.
>
> Thanks!
> Hernan.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project