On 22 Jun 2017, at 18:18, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:It���s worth saying that the diff view on Epicea appears to be correct assuming left is previous and right is new (so I think it also shows the panes the other way around like I expected).TimOn 22 Jun 2017, at 17:03, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:I think the left to right or right to left is probably a very opinionated thing (and I think Araxis, another tool I���ve used does it the other way around).However the colour coding is something that should properly communicate what is going on - and I���m curious if anyone else has noticed it seems to be wrong (it sounds like for you its definitely confusing).I think there are known bugs in iceberg (not sure how much on the diff view - I also noticed that class comments don���t seem to appear in the diff and I also see spurious method categorisation differences as well).TimOn 22 Jun 2017, at 06:51, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:I didn't look at the iceberg diff right now. But I can say whenever I see a diff view in pharo it is so confusing I never know what I see. In the changes window I alwas switch from diff to source to see at least what I have now. Maybe a general problem how to put chronological change. And maybe for left-to-right readers to only way is older left - newer rightNorbertHi Guys - when you launch the Synchronize window in iceberg - is it me, or are the colour highlights backwards (and possibly the ordering of the panes)?If the left pane is my working copy, and I've added some code to a method - why does it appear in red on the left (which typically means deleted?). I notice that in IntelliJ (and other tools) your working changes are typically on the right and things you add are in Green on that right hand side.I think that ordering and colour coding make more sense - from -> to, and red is deleted, green is added.Of course I can live with the different pane ordering, but I think the colours might be wrong?Tim