Repost (it was rejected as from the wrong account)
On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, Ben Coman ��wrote:
Hi richard,��I appreciate your goal.�� Smalltalk & Pharo do need more PR.�� I can see how Pharo not being "a smalltalk" may affect it being your poster-child for your new site, however you should review the archives before launching into that argument as a newcomer :)�� Although as a PR exercise, outside viewpoints are useful.Certainly Pharo does not want to be "constrained" by being "a small talk" per smalltalk80.��However some of the recent posted historical videos put that in perspective with several PARC small talk versions��being quite different.�� Small talk continually evolves. �� ��Btw, can you drop the movie quotations.�� It comes across a bit high-handed - like it's trying to teach something - but I ��can't work out your implied meaning. �� Someone else's words can only ever be an approximation.�� You own words are better.Good Luck with your venture.�� I'll look into it more when I have Better net access.BenOn Wednesday, December 31, 2014, horrido <horrido.hobbies@gmail.com> wrote:Which is why I've chosen Pharo as the public "face" of Smalltalk. It has the
most active community, and the best chance of widespread adoption.
Still, to call it a "new language", to say that "it's not Smalltalk", is a
mistake.
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Smalltalk-Renaissance-Program-tp4797112p4797374.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.