initialize

�� �� "self initialize"

�� �� VoidPointer2 := FFITypeArray ofType: 'void*' size: 2.

Now when I debug into "self rebuildFieldAccessors"

into #compileFields:withAccessors:

through�� "fieldSpec fieldsAndTypesDo: [ :fieldName :type |�� "

the [Variables] tab shows...��

�� �� �� type�� ����"FFITypeArrayType(a subclass of FFITypeArray)"

and my perception is that this is wrong��

since FFITypeArrayType is not a subclass FFITypeArray.

Intuitively I'm reading the text in the round brackets as a commentary on FFITypeArrayType.

But debugging into "type printString"

bring me to FFITypeArrayType(FFIExternalReferenceType) >> printOn: aStream

�� �� �� aStream << self className << '(' << objectClass name << ')'

where objectClass is an instance variable, so the commentary is about composition rather than inheritance.����

Now I properly understand the truth, I still have trouble with perceiving the printString the wrong way, so I'd like to add a visual cue that this is composition.��

Do we have such a standard convention?

Options...

1. Square brackets�� ��

a.�� �� �� FFITypeArrayType[a subclass of FFITypeArray]��

2. Curly brackets

a.�� �� ��FFITypeArrayType{a subclass of FFITypeArray}��

3. Array-ish

4. Text

a.�� �� ��FFITypeArrayType(holding a subclass of FFITypeArray)�� �� ��

I'm tending towards [2a] or [2b] since two brackets together seem more distinct.

It may be easy to overlook a difference in a single bracket,

and also it feels more like holding something inside the object.

cheers -ben

P.S. Regarding the existing Libclang bindings.�� I'm not trying to compete but more along the line... "its worthwhile reinventing the wheel when you want to learn more about how a wheel works."�� ��I'll switch over to existing bindings in a while.