Hi
guys
I do not have the answer but I hate such patterns
������ Smalltalk ui icons iconNamed:
#protocolExtension.
To me a tools using an icon should declare the icons
as a ***local*** ressources.
We could imagine that there is a IconContainer and
that as a tool I declare that I want an
icons and I install it on myself.
���� | t |
���� t := Tool new.
���� ic := IconContainer for: #darkTheme.
���� t askAninnstallIcon: ic iconFor: #button.
������ ������
Then if the IconContainer changes, then it can
notify its users to ask for a new version of the
icon.
������ ic broadcastNewIcon: #button
This way
������ t does not have to use a plain bad global
variable and does not care about the global
namespace.
������ t should only use local resources held in
classVar for example.
Such Smalltalk ui icons is a dynamic global
variable!
Stef
Le 4/2/16 17:00,
Esteban Lorenzano a ��crit��:
Smalltalk ui icons iconNamed: #protocolExtension.
Still ugly, but I���m not happy with
the idea of a selector-per-icon��� they will never
be enough and well��� is like a monolithic
vision.��
Not that what we have is much
better, but you can consider it an iteration :)
Esteban
Hi
For ages to access an icon
we used:
Smalltalk
ui icons protocolPrivateIcon
Smalltalk ui icons��returns
an instance of ThemeIcons.
ThemeIcons>>#doesNotUnderstand:
aMessage converts message
sent to iconNamed:��aMessage
selector which works.
BUT we have this all over
the image:
<Screen Shot 2016-02-04
at 16.13.03.png>
So, what is the best
practice to access icons to use in
application?