frank is it a browser plugin?

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar@gmail.com> wrote:

On 4 May 2017 at 08:55, askoh <askoh@askoh.com> wrote:
Thanks everyone for digging out the various possibilities. It is heartening
to know the community is healthy and engaging.

Let me summarize the possibilities:
1) Recompile Smalltalk VM from C to WebAssembly to run inside a browser at
near native speed. This means a complete Smalltalk IDE inside a browser with
full access to the browser innards.

It's not WebAssembly but Squeak running in a browser is already old news, thanks to Bert Freudenberg - see http://try.squeak.org/#url=http://files.squeak.org/5.0/&zip=[Squeak5.0-15113.zip,SqueakV50.sources.zip] and��https://squeak.js.org/. I don't know about interop between that image running in the browser, and the browser itself.

frank
��
2) Embed Chromium or ChromeHeadless or WebKit inside the Smalltalk IDE.
Browser access is through the exposed APIs.
3) Enhance Scamper, a basic browser written in Smalltalk, to include more
and more of the capabilities of Chrome say.

All the best,
Aik-Siong Koh



--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Smalltalk-Internet-Browser-tp4944879p4945606.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.