I happen to know quite a number of projects.

So, what's the best path to follow to put a description in them?

Editing configs and saving to MetaRepo is not an issue but will put my name all over upon save, which is not really nice to people making the work.

I can spend a couple hours on it this week.

Please advise.

Phil

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:

On 05 Jan 2016, at 17:06, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:

On 05-01-16 16:56, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:

On 05 Jan 2016, at 16:51, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:

On 05-01-16 16:21, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
So��� I took a couple of minutes to do a small list of project description status:

From a total of 379 projects currently in the catalog, just 115 have a description and/or keywords associated.
Which means 264 are mysterious projects nobody can guess what are they about.

I was thinking most of this projects would be in Unsorted (or Pharo 3), but I found that many are also on Pharo 5 and 4���. which is frankly unacceptable :)
Even very important projects like Seaside or Garage and Glorp are not documented.

So, please people��� take a look at your projects and PLEASE, provide a description and proper keywords��� Nobody can guess what is Aconcagua (besides a cool mountain in south america), or Telescope, etc., etc., etc.

Here the list of non-documented projects:

ss3 has no projects?

catalog just catalogs projects in the MetaRepos
you project can live where he wants, but configuration needs to be copied into MetaRepoForPharoXX

that���s how always was, and that���s what catalog shows :)

http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20

hmmm��� didn���t remember that existed :)
but i was even considering propose you to deprecate the unsorted repository (a lot of obsolete projects there)�����

Esteban


Stephan