On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Frank Shearar
<frank.shearar@gmail.com> wrote:
On 25 July 2012 11:42, Mariano Martinez Peck <
marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys. Did I miss something or ContextPart>>copyTo: �should be renamed to
> #copyUpTo: �?
There's only one
#copyTo: implementor (ContextPart) and only one #copyUpTo:
(SequenceableCollection) and both are "up to and including" copies. In
other words there isn't a clear precedence one way or the other for
having #copyTo: meaning either "and including" or "not including".
Your argument is, I guess, that there should be? (The method comments
are perfectly clear on what both method do, at least.)
With #copyTo: I feel that I am copying from one place (source) to a target, when what it actually does (if I understood correctly) is to copy the source (receiver) up to the parameter (stop there). So #copyTo: is totally misleading.�
�
frank