That's a bit harsh, the fonts are the same ;-)
And it is of course possible that you don't like it, it is a matter of taste.
The contrast thing is also taste, but for some people it solve certain vision problems.
> On 24 Apr 2015, at 09:27, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
>
> That's funny because I tried it two days ago the first time and I didn't like it. I had troubles to get anything but bitmap fonts. After setting all things up I was a bit disappointed that contrast wise it doesn't work for me. Can someone send a screenshot with one setup that he/she considers good?
>
> thanks,
>
> Norbert
>
>> Am 24.04.2015 um 08:38 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:
>>
>> I disagree��� DarkTheme is just for certain tastes, while regular one, while probably dated, is more ���standard���.
>> Also, DarkTheme is not ready. yeah, yeah��� it works and works fine most of the time��� but not *all* the time (take for example find string dialog��� I never found the time to fix it, and nobody complained so��� :P). Finally. we need to adopt SVG icons (in my TODO list since a couple of months, I will deliver soon, I hope), otherwise they do not look good (this is a problem eclipse itself had it��� we are just inheriting it :) )
>>
>> But a good question would be: How can we push forward our UI, besides using a darker or clearer theme?
>> I would like to hear some opinions here :)
>>
>> Esteban
>>
>>
>>> On 24 Apr 2015, at 08:33, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> comments about color is to be taken with care.
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 24/4/15 02:48, Sean P. DeNigris a ��crit :
>>>> Why didn't/don't we make it the default for 4.0? Everyone seems to love it,
>>>> and people are commenting that the UI looks dated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Sean
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Release-with-Dark-Theme-tp4821496.html
>>>> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>