Hi!

I'm taking a look at the AST annotation in�

RBProgramNode>>annotateInClass: aBehavior
self annotateInScope: (RBVariableScope�
owner: (RBLiteralScope�
owner: RBRootScope new�
class: aBehavior)
class: aBehavior)

With that code, the order in which variables are annotated is

1) inst vars
2) literal vars (class vars, pools, globals in the environment)
3) the root scope -> pseudo-vars (self, super, thiscontext)

Shouldn't the order be different? Something like:

1) pseudo-vars (self, super, thiscontext)
2) inst vars
3) literal vars (class vars, pools, globals in the environment)

So there are never conflicts, and no other scope can bind pseudo-vars?

Cheers,
Guille