Just remove it :)
DoruOn Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
... and we're starting from scratch again, sorry, I spent too much time discussing
On 2013-06-23, at 21:40, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> Actually, a better implementation would be:
>
> Object>>is: aClassOrSymbol
> ^ aClassOrSymbol asString = self class name asString
> Like this you can even pass the class instead of its name (I presume that
> printOn: will not change any time soon so we can rely on the fact that we
> can polymorphically obtain the name of the class via asString).
this already :P
=> I am very much against comparing strings, this just doesn't scale
--"Every thing has its own flow"