On Jun 23, 2013, at 10:08 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

Just remove it :)

I do not really like to have extra symbol not directly connected to their classes.
I understand the idea behind is: but �. 

Doru


On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:

On 2013-06-23, at 21:40, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

> Actually, a better implementation would be:
>
> Object>>is: aClassOrSymbol
> ^ aClassOrSymbol asString = self class name asString



> Like this you can even pass the class instead of its name (I presume that
> printOn: will not change any time soon so we can rely on the fact that we
> can polymorphically obtain the name of the class via asString).


... and we're starting from scratch again, sorry, I spent too much time discussing
this already :P

=> I am very much against comparing strings, this just doesn't scale



--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"