anyway, I added a 3.2 version, so I can reference it in my projects (is *really* not good to reference to a baseline of an external project in your own� that just leads to a lot of pain :) 

Esteban

On 05 Jan 2014, at 12:42, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:

grrrr

one of this days we should write the �metacello compendium�, and create agreements in ways to do things :P



On 05 Jan 2014, at 12:41, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

I added a development version to point to the baseline :)

Cheers,
Doru


On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
and you added a baseline 3.2 but not a version (not cool, doru, not cool :)

On 05 Jan 2014, at 12:07, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:

MAElementRow was still depending on RectangleMorph. 
But it was more a problem of the #stable release: it was not updated. 

Esteban

On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:42, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

Hi Esteban,

I fixed this issue in Magritte-Morph a long time ago when we ported Moose to Pharo 3.0. What exactly is the issue?

Cheers,
Doru




On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:

On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:33, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:

>
> On 05 Jan 2014, at 11:30, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> � is not there anymore.
>> And Magritte-Morph requires it :(
>>
>> my guess: I was another victim of Stef compulsion of giving us a better and cleaning system :)
>>
>
> The thing was that it had no state nor behaviour different to Morph� everywhere where it was used
> (and especially subclassed), one could just put Morph. One concept less�

cool� :)

>
>> But it should be replaced by what?
>>
> Morph
>
>       Marcus
>
>





--

"Every thing has its own flow"





--

"Every thing has its own flow"