Why Future required compiler changes?
What problem to implement #future message as any other method?
If it is about performance can you explain why basic implementation should have bad speed? And what benchmarks was used to verify it?

2013/5/22 David T. Lewis <lewis@mail.msen.com>
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:26:04PM +0200, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
> No, I know nothing about the Future implementation in Squeak? but
> a Future node in the AST sounds extremely strange.

I think that the background may be found in this thread:
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2009-December/142111.html

Dave