> On 08 Jun 2015, at 17:03, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@inria.fr> wrote:
>
>
> Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> writes:
>
>> I am not so sure we should add that.
>>
>> The JSON spec explicitly does not allow comments because of fear of abuse (that the comments would be used to add semantic meaning outside the spec).
>
>
> really? That's surprising. Comments in configuration files are very
> important. Even more when the configuration files are templates for new
> users.

I know some people are using STON in ways that I did not originally anticipate, that is of course cool, but writing configuration files was not the original goal. STON is a version of JSON that is closer to our object model.

Like I said, I will think about it.

> --
> Damien Cassou
> http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
>
> "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
> losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
>