I guess nobody would expect that you would such an old setup with new Pharo?

Maybe it should be removed altogether? Why are people using four years old libraries with the latest Pharo?

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Petr Fischer <petr.fischer@me.com> wrote:

Hello,

look at this page:
http://pharo.org/gnu-linux-installation

and try to download "libc < 2.15" or "centos" versions.
Both are broken - error message immediately after start:

"This interpreter (vers. 6505) cannot read image file (vers. 6521)."

So, the first impression is really terrible (don't work at all).
Default GNU/Linux download is probably OK.

pf