On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:

I am interested as well.

I had some private discussions with Norbert and Doru,
and I used a different approach on one of my projects very recently
that I am quite happy with.

BTW, I have long term plans to change ZnLogEvent...

On 19 May 2014, at 14:31, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

> Me too. I already gave a first set of feedback.
>
> As a general matter, I would be interested in:
> - unifying with the ZnLogEvent
> - Split the Log class
> - Possibly support Fuel serialization for each log entry
>
> Doru
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:01 AM, phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
> SystemLogger interests me as well.
>
> Phil
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> I��m definitely in for the SystemLogger. But as I am involved in it anyway a fresh look from another person on that stuff could be benefitial.
>
> Norbert
>
> Am 19.05.2014 um 09:10 schrieb stepharo <stepharo@free.fr>:
>
> > Hi guys
> >
> > This is a call for some of you that committed code and would like to do it with me :).
> > I have some projects that I would like to push further in 4.0 and I'm thinking that
> > he could be much more fun to do it with other people.
> >
> > Here are some topics
> > �� - integrating the systemLogger
> > �� - integrating/improving the new method categorizer
> > �� - cleaning fonts
> > �� - ...
> >
> > How this could work?
> > We could have
> > �� - some discussions
> > �� - make a little roadmap
> > �� - then we could work on the same slice and do code review
> >
> > I think that it can be fun and motivating. So let me know because I would like to have more social
> > coding.
> >
> > Stef
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
>
> "Every thing has its own flow"