On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Martin McClure <martin@hand2mouse.com> wrote:
Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
> My question is, do you really need a dev 1.1 image? �It was removed from
> the website as most of the tools are not working yet in 1.1.
>
> Why you cannot use 1.0 dev ?

I'm working on the hashed collection speedup, which I believe is only to
be integrated into 1.1. And the affected code has changed in 1.1, and
some of the code affected is not in the core, so I wanted to use an
up-to-date dev image.


Let me see if I understood. There is some code that will be affected, not only for the core but also from external packages ?

If this is correct, I will wait a bit until 1.0 is released, the tools are working in 1.1 and we start to build 1.1 Dev images.

But I guess I should just do a version for the 1.1 core, and each
additional package that would be affected can be updated independently
later.


Yes, I guess. The other laternative is to try each Metacello configuration for each package and see if they work. Maybe I don't know, you want OCompletion, and that is working. So, giving a try is very easy. To look the current Metacello configurations, you can look in http://www.squeaksource.com/MetacelloRepository

However, I really don't know even if Metacello is working in 1.1 images.

Cheers

Mariano
Thanks for the info,

-Martin


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project