On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 4:18 PM, St�phane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Hi
why can we put comment in class comment?
For example I worked on fixing 1.2 and now I want to execute the configurationOfPharo and no magic invocation....
JUST A FUCKING EMPTY class comment as usual.
So again I feel like an idiot and I'm trying in the dark. You have NOT A SINGLE REASON NOT TO PUT COMMENT!
One of these days I will hack the system to break the load when a class as no comment.
I was the original author of such class. And yes, I don't write class comments. I am not use too, usually because:
- I almost don't find it use
- The browser doesn't help me to see class comments
- Who can guess that under a '?' there are class comments? I discovered that YEARS after I was already using Smalltalk
- I prefer writting/reading a TestCase for such class (I know it is not the same as class comments, but it helps).
- I prefer looking at senders/references to such class
- When class comments are long, the browser is FUCKING slow to write
Even more, in this case, what would you write for example?� ConfigurationOf* are just Metacello Configurations. What would you need to know about that despite of Metacello?� If you know Metacello, you should know how to query the configuration and get all the things you want, like groups, packages, etc
So now after randomly trying.....I get a nice DNU.
But do you think that could be fixed just because of having class comments?
�
Apparently my time is not worth anything....
So if you want to see if my fix works. Give a try I will not and if what I did break, may be I will have a look or may be not
because no time for that after.
And BTW do not put any comment, it feels much cooler that way.
Stef