On 2013-09-13, at 12:09, Chris Cunningham <cunningham.cb@gmail.com> wrote:
> so, if this is a class, would Session be an appropriate superclass for a
> WebSession class? ��or any other type of Session class?

I would say so. It is as generic as the name suggests. The class is lightweight
and only contains the time when it was created.

> That particular
> name would seem to collide with other forms of Sessions, wouldn't it? ��Or
> is this safely hidden in a Pharo Environment, so it won't collide elsewhere
> (or entice other developers to try to use it for other Session style
> objects)?

It is a normal class, thus yes, collision is possible. Again, it can easily
serve as a superclass for other session-like objects.